They're
Thing is, children grow up to become young adults and onward. I'm SURE they would want to be tracked everywhere they go, movements analyzed, no sense of privacy.
If these chips are RFID tags, they only work if you are in close proximity to a reader. If a child is lost, it's not like you can get a GPS lock on them. You have to already be close to them. If you ARE talking something more like GPS tagging, then the implant becomes much larger than a dog chip.
Thing is, children grow up to become young adults and onward. I'm SURE they would want to be tracked everywhere they go, movements analyzed, no sense of privacy.
If these chips are RFID tags, they only work if you are in close proximity to a reader. If a child is lost, it's not like you can get a GPS lock on them. You have to already be close to them. If you ARE talking something more like GPS tagging, then the implant becomes much larger than a dog chip.
No worries, all Safe Spaces will be equipped with a reader.
It's the RFID chip again. It's like the gun thing. Every time there's a shooting, theres gun ban discussion. Now they're going to start with the RFID chip every time a kid goes missing...even though, like you say, they don't work the way the're being advertised.
Having a tough time with their/they're/there today, huh?
Thing is, children grow up to become young adults and onward. I'm SURE they would want to be tracked everywhere they go, movements analyzed, no sense of privacy.
If these chips are RFID tags, they only work if you are in close proximity to a reader. If a child is lost, it's not like you can get a GPS lock on them. You have to already be close to them. If you ARE talking something more like GPS tagging, then the implant becomes much larger than a dog chip.
An NBC News report that promotes the microchipping of children asserts that it will happen “sooner rather than later” and that Americans will eventually accept the process as something just as normal as the barcode.
Hell of an intelligent resource...here is the first paragraph:
The news report is also noted as "NBC" later in the piece.
This isn't from NBC News...it is from Channel 8...an NBC affiliate. BIG, BIG difference...a quality source would know this.
Thing is, children grow up to become young adults and onward. I'm SURE they would want to be tracked everywhere they go, movements analyzed, no sense of privacy.
If these chips are RFID tags, they only work if you are in close proximity to a reader. If a child is lost, it's not like you can get a GPS lock on them. You have to already be close to them. If you ARE talking something more like GPS tagging, then the implant becomes much larger than a dog chip.
Or they could just carry a smartphone everywhere they go. No RFID or microchip necessary.
:shrug:
Ok, sure. Good idea.
Because no child has ever traded, dropped, broken or lost anything ever.
OMG! I misspelled the word!
No big deal. I mispelled 'bred" with bread past weekend concerning racehorses.![]()
OMG! I misspelled the word!
We all make mistakes.