This is tragic!

mv_princess

mv_princess

mv = margaritaville
Masey said:
Nope, I don't know what you think or want and I personally don’t care - but feel free to tell the entire class what your AV says about you. I do think your AV promotes and continues the stereotype that women are sex objects and should be viewed as such.
Click to expand...
you are a prude aren't you? :poorbaby: you should try watching a porn. It would do you some good.
 
M

Masey

New Member
mv_princess said:
you are a prude aren't you? :poorbaby: you should try watching a porn. It would do you some good.
Click to expand...
You're shameless aren't you? :poorbaby: you should try attending a church service. It would do you some good.
 
mv_princess

mv_princess

mv = margaritaville
Masey said:
You're shameless aren't you? :poorbaby: you should try attending a church service. It would do you some good.
Click to expand...
then I would be taken to jail for starting a fire. And well that wouldn't be good.


What's wrong with sex? Sex is healthy for you. And natural!
 
kwillia

kwillia

n/a
mv_princess said:
then I would be taken to jail for starting a fire. And well that wouldn't be good.


What's wrong with sex? Sex is healthy for you. And natural!
Click to expand...
VERY TRUE...

The best that modern science can say for abstinence is that it's harmless when practiced in moderation. "Saving yourself" before the big game, the big business deal, the big hoe-down or the big bakeoff may indeed confer some moral advantage; but physiologically it does zip.

Having regular and enthusiastic sex, by contrast, confers a host of measurable physiological advantages, be you male or female. (This assumes that you are engaging in sex without contracting a sexually transmitted disease.)

In one of the most credible studies correlating overall health with sexual frequency, Queens University in Belfast tracked the mortality of about 1,000 middle-aged men over the course of a decade. The study was designed to compare people of similar age and health. Its findings, published in 1997 in the British Medical Journal, were that men who reported the highest frequency of orgasm enjoyed a death rate half that of the laggards. Other studies (some rigorous, some less so) purport to show that having sex even a few times a week has an associative or causal relationship with the following:

*Improved sense of smell: After sex, production of the hormone prolactin surges. This, in turn, causes stem cells in the brain to develop new neurons in the brain's olfactory bulb, its smell center.

*Reduced risk of heart disease: In a 2001 follow-up to the Queens University study mentioned above, researchers focused on cardiovascular health. Their finding? That by having sex three or more times a week, men reduced their risk of heart attack or stroke by half.

*Weight loss, overall fitness: Sex, if nothing else, is exercise. A vigorous bout burns some 200 calories — about the same as running 15 minutes on a treadmill or playing a spirited game of squash. The pulse rate, in a person aroused, rises from about 70 beats per minute to 150, the same as that of an athlete putting forth maximum effort.

Men's Health magazine has gone so far as to call the bed the single greatest piece of exercise equipment ever invented.
 
M

Masey

New Member
mv_princess said:
then I would be taken to jail for starting a fire. And well that wouldn't be good.

What's wrong with sex? Sex is healthy for you. And natural!
Click to expand...
The subject at hand has nothing to do with sex and I never said that there was anything wrong with sex either. Why do you keep insisting that my objection to your AV must be based upon sex?
 
mv_princess

mv_princess

mv = margaritaville
kwillia said:
VERY TRUE...

The best that modern science can say for abstinence is that it's harmless when practiced in moderation. "Saving yourself" before the big game, the big business deal, the big hoe-down or the big bakeoff may indeed confer some moral advantage; but physiologically it does zip.

Having regular and enthusiastic sex, by contrast, confers a host of measurable physiological advantages, be you male or female. (This assumes that you are engaging in sex without contracting a sexually transmitted disease.)

In one of the most credible studies correlating overall health with sexual frequency, Queens University in Belfast tracked the mortality of about 1,000 middle-aged men over the course of a decade. The study was designed to compare people of similar age and health. Its findings, published in 1997 in the British Medical Journal, were that men who reported the highest frequency of orgasm enjoyed a death rate half that of the laggards. Other studies (some rigorous, some less so) purport to show that having sex even a few times a week has an associative or causal relationship with the following:

*Improved sense of smell: After sex, production of the hormone prolactin surges. This, in turn, causes stem cells in the brain to develop new neurons in the brain's olfactory bulb, its smell center.

*Reduced risk of heart disease: In a 2001 follow-up to the Queens University study mentioned above, researchers focused on cardiovascular health. Their finding? That by having sex three or more times a week, men reduced their risk of heart attack or stroke by half.

*Weight loss, overall fitness: Sex, if nothing else, is exercise. A vigorous bout burns some 200 calories — about the same as running 15 minutes on a treadmill or playing a spirited game of squash. The pulse rate, in a person aroused, rises from about 70 beats per minute to 150, the same as that of an athlete putting forth maximum effort.

Men's Health magazine has gone so far as to call the bed the single greatest piece of exercise equipment ever invented.
Click to expand...
I don't see what they problem is. I have my morals. I waited until I was 18. And I don't sleep around. And have had very few sex partners.

but to be honest, I love sex, I respect sex.

And I don't need Church. they don't know what they are talking about there.
 
mv_princess

mv_princess

mv = margaritaville
Masey said:
The subject at hand has nothing to do with sex and I never said that there was anything wrong with sex either. Why do you keep insisting that my objection to your AV must be based upon sex?
Click to expand...
Then what is the problem with my AV? Because it shows chicks legs? Or is it the high heels? Or is it because she is laying down?
And there must be something wrong with sex, because you said I need to go to church when I mentioned it.
 
mainman

mainman

Set Trippin
Masey said:
The subject at hand has nothing to do with sex and I never said that there was anything wrong with sex either. Why do you keep insisting that my objection to your AV must be based upon sex?
Click to expand...
User Control Panel ---------> Edit Options ---------------> Thread Display Options: Uncheck the little box to the left of "Show Avatars".... problem solved...

You are welcome...
 
mv_princess

mv_princess

mv = margaritaville
mainman said:
User Control Panel ---------> Edit Options ---------------> Thread Display Options: Uncheck the little box to the left of "Show Avatars".... problem solved...

You are welcome...
Click to expand...
:love: you are so smart!
 
PrepH4U

PrepH4U

New Member
Masey said:
You're shameless aren't you? :poorbaby: you should try attending a church service. It would do you some good.
Click to expand...
Well when you attend will you be praying for the 5 unfortunate souls who can no longer learn or shop? :shrug:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top