I don't think that the nation simply did not want him, the margin is only at @3.5 million votes. This was a very close race. If no one had voted for Nader, it would have been even smaller. I think that the nation is very split over what they want in a president, and I didn't think that any of the two main poops had what we wanted. That would be a strong, smart, honest, charming, good-looking man with concrete values and big plans. Someone who can handle the terrorists and get us that oil. Someone who will make the world a better place.
I have always thought that the difference between the dems and reps was that the reps , had all the money and wanted more, they liked having poor people so that they could feel bigger than someone, they were war junkies and had no clue how it is to be a real person, living a normal life, they cared nothing for the enviroment or conserving resources, drive their big gas hog SUVS to Martha's Vinyard and eat huge streaks full of chemicals and crap.
Democrats are not like that at all . They care . Bullshiat!
I really should have voted for either K or B, but I didn't. I know that since I did not , my vote was basically wasted. What ever. As I sit here looking at how divided this nation is today, seeing that alot of people didn't vote for either one, and that there won't be a clear cut WINNER, I can only hope that in the next century things wil begin to change. It takes time. I am not happy with the way things are and that's why I voted tha way I did. Eventually things will have to change.
Kerry sucks and Bush sucks. I voted for the party I liked best not the man. Which is why more folks don't vote for the other parties, they vote dem or rep that's it. Niether was worth it.