To The Relief of Men Everywhere

GURPS

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Green-Haired, Morbidly Obese Leftist Women Call for Sex Strike Over Abortion Ruling​



It’s an idea as old as Aristophanes’ Lysistrata (that’s a play from the 5th century BC, kids): women who haven’t gotten their way have decided to withhold sex from their men until the frustrated lugs comply with their wishes. In New York City’s Union Square on Saturday, a pro-abortion protester named Caroline Healey declared: “I think it’s absolutely valid for us to be withholding the Holy Grail that men seem to think is important.” Judging from the many videos that have surfaced over the last few days of green-haired, slovenly dressed, morbidly obese, body-painted pro-abortion protesters, there is only one response: Your terms are acceptable.

Nevertheless, Caroline Healey’s words were eye-catching: she and her pro-abortion allies don’t seem to realize that all too many men whom they count among their ranks are not there because they are sensitive feminists who are attuned to female suffering. On the contrary, many men stand with the pro-abortion crowd precisely because the easy availability of abortion enables them to behave cavalierly in regard to that “Holy Grail that men seem to think is important” and to move from woman to woman without any compulsion to consider a life of commitment and responsibility. If Healey and her ilk want men to think about them as anything other than utterly disposable sex objects, the answer is not a sex strike, but a return to traditional ideas of marriage and family.

American culture has moved so far from those ideas, however, that they don’t even occur to these modern-day Lysistratas. Another protester, Brianna Campbell, said: “If you’re a man who won’t get a vasectomy, even though it’s reversible, and you’re not out in the streets fighting for my rights, you do not deserve to have sex with me.” Healey added: “Why shouldn’t we withhold it if we’re always worried that they’re not going put a condom on, that they’re going take one off after we ask them to? If we can’t safely go out and have sex and know that we will have a choice after that, then why should we be expected to?”
 
LightRoasted

LightRoasted

If I may ...
For your consideration ...

I'm wondering why more women aren't taking on more personal responsibility and going out to get their tubes tied if they want to have so much unrestricted sex? After all, it is a reversible procedure.
 
H

herb749

Well-Known Member
If the govt was paying for it sure. But then the lawyers line up to sue if women have problems.
 
Hijinx

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
For every woman that refuses sex to a male there is another who will gladly enjoy the pleasure of sex.
The only women who refuse sex are those who don't like sex, and who needs a woman like that anyway.
Let them have their gratification with some dyke who feels the same way they do.
Feminists like this are a turn off. Who needs them.
Do me a favor lady,cut me off so I can find a real woman.
 
R

rio

Well-Known Member
LightRoasted said:
For your consideration ...

I'm wondering why more women aren't taking on more personal responsibility and going out to get their tubes tied if they want to have so much unrestricted sex? After all, it is a reversible procedure.
Click to expand...
LightRoasted said:
That a "Man" would alter his natural state just to lay with a woman, is a man that has no self-esteem, and is the classical example of a PW'd individual. In addition, I call the story BS propaganda. Unless of course they are referring to the effeminate soy-boys of today.
Click to expand...
So why is it ok for a woman to alter her natural state to have less chance of pregnancy but not a man? If they are both willing partners why is one to be held more accountable than the other if they have both decided they don't want children?
A woman can still get pregnant even while her tubes are tied and have an ectopic pregnancy that can cause the woman's death. A man can still get a woman pregnant after having a vasectomy, but it's not likely to cause more than a pregnancy. Both procedures can be reversed if one really wants to have kids later. My husband had a vasectomy. It wasn't just for me, or so he could get laid, it was because it was best for US, and I can guarantee he's more of a man than you'll ever be.
 
UglyBear

UglyBear

Well-Known Member
LightRoasted said:
That a "Man" would alter his natural state just to lay with a woman, is a man that has no self-esteem, and is the classical example of a PW'd individual. In addition, I call the story BS propaganda. Unless of course they are referring to the effeminate soy-boys of today.
Click to expand...
Or how about…
Happily married people, who have all the kids they can responsibly support, but want to enjoy each other without having to mess with birth control?
 
LightRoasted

LightRoasted

If I may ...
For your consideration ...

rio said:
So why is it ok for a woman to alter her natural state to have less chance of pregnancy but not a man? If they are both willing partners why is one to be held more accountable than the other if they have both decided they don't want children?
A woman can still get pregnant even while her tubes are tied and have an ectopic pregnancy that can cause the woman's death. A man can still get a woman pregnant after having a vasectomy, but it's not likely to cause more than a pregnancy. Both procedures can be reversed if one really wants to have kids later. My husband had a vasectomy. It wasn't just for me, or so he could get laid, it was because it was best for US, and I can guarantee he's more of a man than you'll ever be.
Click to expand...
The point being is, we are being told, scorned, yelled at, that it's the man's responsibility to get cut, or he gets none. Whores that can't keep their legs together, bear no responsibility for their actions, and yet, it's their "right" to demand an abortion as their form of birth control? Hell with that. Seems like MGTOW is the way to go nowadays.
 
vraiblonde

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
LightRoasted said:
That a "Man" would alter his natural state just to lay with a woman, is a man that has no self-esteem, and is the classical example of a PW'd individual. In addition, I call the story BS propaganda. Unless of course they are referring to the effeminate soy-boys of today.
Click to expand...

If a man doesn't want children, he would have a vasectomy. Nothing effeminate about it or low self-esteem about it.

Also, there are plenty of women who still know how to use birth control. If he doesn't want to get jiggy with one of those women, then he should take precautions.
 
black dog

black dog

Free America
LightRoasted said:
For your consideration ...


The point being is, we are being told, scorned, yelled at, that it's the man's responsibility to get cut, or he gets none. Whores that can't keep their legs together, bear no responsibility for their actions, and yet, it's their "right" to demand an abortion as their form of birth control? Hell with that. Seems like MGTOW is the way to go nowadays.
Click to expand...
What do you call these men that lay with these 'Whores' that indiscriminately deposit there fish up in their.
 
LightRoasted

LightRoasted

If I may ...
For your consideration ...

vraiblonde said:
If a man doesn't want children, he would have a vasectomy. Nothing effeminate about it or low self-esteem about it.

Also, there are plenty of women who still know how to use birth control. If he doesn't want to get jiggy with one of those women, then he should take precautions.
Click to expand...
Pretty sure I covered this somewhere ..... Responsible men will use a condom. Now added for clarification. Single men should never get cut just to please a woman or to have sex with a woman. You married men, balancing the risks, that's fine. Nothing wrong with doing so to further enjoy wedded bliss. What's even better is waiting for the wife to pass menopause, and save the getting the cut.
 
Kyle

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
vraiblonde said:
All men (and women) should make their own personal decisions with no regard for the opinions of strangers on the internet.
Click to expand...
Blasphemy!

people shouldn’t be making their own decisions… That’s what we have the Twitterati for.

:tantrum
 
Gilligan

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
stgislander said:
or Gilligan. :lmao:
Click to expand...
blow me.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top