Transgenders in the US Military

David

Opinions are my own...
PREMO Member
I personally suspect that this issue has less to do with equality than some super-small minority wanting to make a political statement and validate their personal beliefs. Anecdotally, given the photos and videos I have seen of individuals who identify themselves as transgender, I don't see how they could meet the physical requirements.

Face it, life is by nature discriminatory. The people who are smartest, hardest working, best looking, most physically fit, etc. typically rise to the top of their respective challenges in life. Everyone is discriminated against in some manner every day of their lives. Whether the person you ask out for a first date accepts or rejects you, whether you get a job or not; whether you are accepted for a car loan or mortgage...

If the military's purpose is to be a lean mean killing machine, then it serves no universal justice to allow unqualified people into the ranks, just because they feel discriminated against, especially if it means putting someone else's life at risk.

When I was a youngster, the popular TV show MASH made light of one guy dressing up as a woman to get out of military service. Now the guys who dress up as women are fighting to be in the military. I guess in military parlance, we would call this an About Face.

---
[h=1]General Officers Question Army Chief of Staff's Statement on Transgender Service[/h][h=2]New York Times Quote by General Milley Called a “Refusal to Follow the Science”[/h]SAN FRANCISCO, CA – Two retired General Officers have sent a letter to Army Chief of Staff Mark Milley in response to his concerns about transgender military service. Despite extensive study by a Pentagon Working Group, the RAND Corporation, and an independent commission of retired General Officers and leading scholars and experts, General Milley suggested recently that before the military can lift its ban on transgender personnel, "serious significant issues need to be completely vetted and studied."

Generals Claudia Kennedy and Gale Pollock observe in today's letter, however, that "the problem is not a lack of inquiry or a failure to identify simple, straightforward solutions," but rather, that "some military leaders don’t like what the science has already told us," and they "refus[e] to assess transgender personnel by the same standards that apply to everyone else."

According to Palm Center Director Aaron Belkin, "When the Marine Corps conducted a faulty study about women in combat, Navy Secretary Ray Mabus stated that arguments based on distorted research were not an option." Belkin added that, "Given the exhaustive research that the military as well as independent experts have already completed on transgender service, General Milley’s call for additional study is just as misleading."

Generals Kennedy and Pollock state in today's letter that if there are new, honest and evidence-based objections to transgender military service, then those concerns should be identified so that they can be assessed and resolved. "But to insist that the issue must be studied and vetted when that has already been done (many times)," they conclude, "is to compromise core values that have served as the bedrock of military culture throughout our nation’s history."
[h=2]Click here to download a PDF of the letter to General Milley[/h]
# # #
About The Palm Center
The Palm Center is an independent research institute committed to sponsoring state-of-the-art scholarship to enhance the quality of public dialogue about critical and controversial public policy issues. Our research on sexual minorities in the military has been published in leading social scientific journals. The Palm Center seeks to be a resource for university-affiliated as well as independent scholars, students, journalists, opinion leaders, and members of the public. For more information, see www.palmcenter.org
 

Attachments

  • klinger.jpg
    klinger.jpg
    86.9 KB · Views: 406

David

Opinions are my own...
PREMO Member
Hoyer: House Republicans Vote to Allow Discrimination Against LGBT Americans

Last week, House Republicans voted twice to allow discrimination against LGBT Americans.? First they included a provision in the defense authorization bill to overturn President Obama’s executive order extending anti-discrimination protections to all LGBT employees of federal contractors and refused to allow a vote on an amendment to strike the provision. Later in the week, during a vote on an amendment to ban discrimination against LGBT Americans in the MilCon-VA appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2017, House Republicans held a two-minute vote open for nearly eight minutes and forced seven of their Members to change their votes, ensuring the defeat of the amendment. The proposed amendment, introduced by Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (NY-18), would have amended the bill to ensure that federal contractors cannot discriminate against LGBT employees.

Not only did Republicans vote against equality and inclusion, but they tried to do so quietly, and without identifying those who switched their votes.
“The amendment had appeared to be heading for adoption, with as many as 217 ‘yea’ votes on the board when voting time expired. But that number began dropping as Republican leaders held the vote open beyond the two-minute limit, and the outcome was finally reversed…Democrats also panned Ryan for keeping the vote open after time expired, a practice Ryan said he would do away with upon taking over the speakership late last year.” [CQ, 5/19/16]

“[A]n amendment to help protect LGBT people from discrimination failed by just one vote as Republicans succeeded in convincing a few members of their own party to switch their votes to help ensure the measure would not pass.” [NBC News, 5/19/16]

“The two-minute vote was finally gaveled closed after seven minutes and 37 seconds, just after the Republicans had secured the 213 votes to kill [Rep. Sean Patrick] Maloney's amendment.” [The Hill, 5/19/16]

“The proposal…appeared on the cusp of being adopted as the vote came to a close…Outraged Democrats shouted ‘shame’ and accused Republican leaders of abusing chamber rules by holding the vote open until they could twist enough arms to kill the amendment.” [Washington Post, 5/19/16]

Their actions did not go unnoticed. The Human Rights Campaign voiced their opposition to Republican efforts to roll back protections for LGBT Americans:

“‘Today the House Republican leadership abused the voting procedures to twist arms and flip votes to deny LGBT people equal protections under the law,’ said HRC Government Affairs Director David Stacy. ‘The House today voted against the seven in ten Americans who support legal protections for LGBT people.’” [5/19/16]

House Democrats will continue to hold Republicans accountable for their actions and fight to prevent discrimination against the LGBT community.
 

Attachments

  • PPDocumentLGBTDiscrimination 052416.pdf
    194.5 KB · Views: 195

mAlice

professional daydreamer
Face it, life is by nature discriminatory. The people who are smartest, hardest working, best looking, most physically fit, etc. typically rise to the top of their respective challenges in life. Everyone is discriminated against in some manner every day of their lives. Whether the person you ask out for a first date accepts or rejects you, whether you get a job or not; whether you are accepted for a car loan or mortgage...

Well said.
 
Top