Trump Admin - DNI Gabbard
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
DOGE: Scores of NSA and CIA employees hate America. Instead of safeguarding US interests federal employees spent their workdays in government chatrooms spewing hatred toward conservatives and Christians. When they weren’t engaged in political diatribes, they were exchanging details about their sexual fetishes. It’s time to clean house.
https://x.com/amuse/status/1894489721294000429/photo/1
Moral Turpitude used to be a think in Gov Service especially in the Intel Services
I hope she and John Ratcliffe go after the traitors at the CIA.
Yowza. Yesterday, the New York Times ran a story headlined, “Gabbard Says More Than 100 Intelligence Officers Fired for Chat Messages.” Chat messages! The picture caption explained (scare quotes alert), “Ms. Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, said the chats were an ‘egregious violation of trust’ that violated ‘basic rules and standards’ of workplace professionalism.”
Okay, so the funniest part of the Times story wasn’t the firings—it was that they were too chicken to quote a single chat message. Not even a vague summary of the repulsive chatter. Unlike yours truly, who at least described it in general terms yesterday. All the Times would admit is that the messages contained “sexual themes,” including “explicit discussion of gender transition surgery.”
The Times did not even try to defend the chats. There weren’t even any quotes from employment lawyers criticizing the firings and vowing to sue.
The overlooked story here is that our intelligence agencies employ people who even think such things, much less chat about them at work. Good gravy! Where is the shame? It this what LGBT “Pride” means? And Heaven help us if these top-secret-clearance officials are actually doing the things they were describing in their sexy chats.
I’d prefer to believe they were just indulging in hyper-promiscuous leather festival fantasies—rather than reporting on real-life experiences. Because some of that stuff should already be illegal. I mean, think about the poor gerbils. Ick. (Okay, sorry, don’t think about them.)
Anyway, by trying to run cover for the intelligence agencies (ask yourself: why??), the Times only managed to accelerate its own decline. What a terrific way to send all your readers scrambling to social media in search of even a hint of what kind of filth got 100 spooks fired. How bad was it?
One example I can share was published by Rufo yesterday. More leaks. In this particular thread, NSA and CIA officials (names redacted) wallowed in peak pathological narcissism, lovingly fantasizing about having hermaphroditic babies— for pushing trans ideology on children. “An intersex birth would be a great opportunity to raise a kid as non-binary and let them choose later,” the (now-former) spook speculated.
Who cares about the kids’ opinions? Am I right? Kids are just a way to bend the arc of history toward depravity. Don’t get in the way of progress. We have six ways from Sunday to get back at you. Just ask Chuck Schumer.
But I digress. The Times article did include at least one astonishing fact not previously seen elsewhere. On top of reporting that there were over 100 involved spooks —enough to field two full NFL football teams— it reported that fifteen different intelligence agencies were implicated. First of all, I didn’t even know we had that many secret departments. Good grief, as Charlie Brown would have said (but I’m glad the plucky little cartoon hero never lived to see this).
Second, the bright side is they finally found a common interest, to knit them all together in a poly-something. Intercourse between agencies, you might say. By which I mean dialog, of course. Drag your brain out of the gutter.
Right about now, Tulsi Gabbard is probably wondering exactly what she signed up for. Sure, she agreed to clean up the intelligence agencies. But this? Things are worse than we thought. The even more fun part is imagining how this might have played out differently if the Deep State hadn’t targeted Tulsi for daring to criticize its Ukraine Project.
Christopher Rufo, who — let’s be honest — is obviously working with the Trump Team, reported last night that Tulsi ordered the firings, with security clearances revoked by Friday:
Two days ago, Florida Representative Anna Paulina Luna, who is heading up the Administration’s Disclosure Task Force, described a “war” having broken out inside the intelligence agencies, and even invoked the dreaded “t-“ word:
www.coffeeandcovid.com
Okay, so the funniest part of the Times story wasn’t the firings—it was that they were too chicken to quote a single chat message. Not even a vague summary of the repulsive chatter. Unlike yours truly, who at least described it in general terms yesterday. All the Times would admit is that the messages contained “sexual themes,” including “explicit discussion of gender transition surgery.”
The Times did not even try to defend the chats. There weren’t even any quotes from employment lawyers criticizing the firings and vowing to sue.
The overlooked story here is that our intelligence agencies employ people who even think such things, much less chat about them at work. Good gravy! Where is the shame? It this what LGBT “Pride” means? And Heaven help us if these top-secret-clearance officials are actually doing the things they were describing in their sexy chats.
I’d prefer to believe they were just indulging in hyper-promiscuous leather festival fantasies—rather than reporting on real-life experiences. Because some of that stuff should already be illegal. I mean, think about the poor gerbils. Ick. (Okay, sorry, don’t think about them.)
Anyway, by trying to run cover for the intelligence agencies (ask yourself: why??), the Times only managed to accelerate its own decline. What a terrific way to send all your readers scrambling to social media in search of even a hint of what kind of filth got 100 spooks fired. How bad was it?
One example I can share was published by Rufo yesterday. More leaks. In this particular thread, NSA and CIA officials (names redacted) wallowed in peak pathological narcissism, lovingly fantasizing about having hermaphroditic babies— for pushing trans ideology on children. “An intersex birth would be a great opportunity to raise a kid as non-binary and let them choose later,” the (now-former) spook speculated.
Who cares about the kids’ opinions? Am I right? Kids are just a way to bend the arc of history toward depravity. Don’t get in the way of progress. We have six ways from Sunday to get back at you. Just ask Chuck Schumer.
But I digress. The Times article did include at least one astonishing fact not previously seen elsewhere. On top of reporting that there were over 100 involved spooks —enough to field two full NFL football teams— it reported that fifteen different intelligence agencies were implicated. First of all, I didn’t even know we had that many secret departments. Good grief, as Charlie Brown would have said (but I’m glad the plucky little cartoon hero never lived to see this).
Second, the bright side is they finally found a common interest, to knit them all together in a poly-something. Intercourse between agencies, you might say. By which I mean dialog, of course. Drag your brain out of the gutter.
Right about now, Tulsi Gabbard is probably wondering exactly what she signed up for. Sure, she agreed to clean up the intelligence agencies. But this? Things are worse than we thought. The even more fun part is imagining how this might have played out differently if the Deep State hadn’t targeted Tulsi for daring to criticize its Ukraine Project.
Christopher Rufo, who — let’s be honest — is obviously working with the Trump Team, reported last night that Tulsi ordered the firings, with security clearances revoked by Friday:
Two days ago, Florida Representative Anna Paulina Luna, who is heading up the Administration’s Disclosure Task Force, described a “war” having broken out inside the intelligence agencies, and even invoked the dreaded “t-“ word:
☕️ BINGES AND PURGES ☙ Wednesday, February 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
DNI Gabbard purges spooky sex chatters; Kiev says it's ready to make a deal; US does real diplomacy in historic UN action; media is losing the covid narrative; possible FBI case against Trump plotters
www.coffeeandcovid.com
Again..... poor Lemiwinks.
UKRAINE: DNI Tulsi Gabbard exposes Europe’s blatant hypocrisy in championing “democracy” while enabling Ukraine’s authoritarian crackdown—cancelling elections, imprisoning opposition leaders, shutting down churches, and seizing total control of the media. As Senator J.D. Vance rightly questioned, if Europe is so committed to fighting Putin, what exactly are they fighting for? It’s clear they aren’t standing for freedom, but rather propping up a corrupt regime that mirrors the very tyranny they claim to oppose.
During her confirmation hearing, Tulsi Gabbard was accused of spreading Russian and Iranian propaganda simply for telling the truth—
That Obama and the CIA destabilized Syria by trying to overthrow Assad, a decision she warned would bring chaos and the persecution of Christians.
She was right.
Tulsi Gabbard Rips Security Clearances From 51 Spies Who Lied, Hits Biden With Some Bad News Too
Names such as former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Directors Mike Hayden, John Brennan, and Leon Panetta, and former National Security Advisor John Bolton signed on to the letter. And by doing so, they eventually signed onto their own security clearance revocation.
Gabbard further ripped clearances from former Secretary of State Antony Blinken, New York Attorney General and rabid anti-Trump advocate Letitia James, and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.
Rounding out the delicious declaration on X is a note from Gabbard that former President Joe Biden is no longer privy to his Daily Brief.
"Per [President Trump's] directive, I have revoked security clearances and barred access to classified information for Antony Blinken, Jake Sullivan, Lisa Monaco, Mark Zaid, Norman Eisen, Letitia James, Alvin Bragg, and Andrew Weissman, along with the 51 signers of the Hunter Biden 'disinformation' letter," Gabbard announced.
"The President's Daily Brief is no longer being provided to former President Biden."
Didn't we know this a few weeks back?
Tulsi Gabbard Declassifies Biden ‘Domestic Terrorism’ Strategy: What’s Inside
The plan in the declassified documents is based on four pillars: “Understand and Share Domestic Terrorism-Related Information,” “Prevent Domestic Terrorism Recruitment and Mobilization to Violence,” “Disrupt and Deter Domestic Terrorism Activity,” and “Confront Long-Term Contributors to Domestic Terrorism.”
The broad goals laid out by the plan included identifying and intervening with “potentially dangerous individuals,” “strengthen[ing] norms of non-violent political expression and rejection of racism and bigotry,” and increasing Americans’ “faith in democracy and the government.”
The plan called for dedicated research and analysis of domestic terrorism, including any potential links to international organizations or governments. To the same end, it called for increased information sharing within federal law enforcement related to domestic terrorism.
Additionally, this pillar proposed that the government “explore” ways to identify domestic terrorism through financial activity, including through greater involvement with financial institutions and scrutiny of citizens’ financial records.
It also called for the government to “Enhance [its] understanding of how foreign state and non-state information operations, particularly disinformation, relate to the domestic terrorism threat.”
That’s essentially federal government parlance for analyzing the impact of foreign actors online. The Biden administration and Democrats repeatedly claimed that Russian “trolls” were responsible for spreading disinformation and misinformation online.
Relatedly, the SIP reveals a plan to “implement evidence-based digital literacy programming to combat online disinformation and DT recruitment and narratives.”
The plan also calls for the FBI and Department of Homeland Security, among others, to “share with relevant technology and other private-industry companies, as appropriate and as expeditiously as possible and on a consistent basis, relevant information on [domestic terrorism]-related and associated transnational terrorist online content.”
It called for guardrails on information-sharing with technology companies, factoring in “legal, privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties review.”
Many conservatives have long been critical of alleged collusion between federal agencies and tech platforms, with many saying that the Biden administration sought to censor and deplatform conservative viewpoints in violation of the First Amendment.