Trump Admin - Sec of HHS Kennedy
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
WingsOfGold
Well-Known Member
He's about the only one I have serious reservations with.
WingsOfGold
Well-Known Member
Bit of a kook, not all vaxes are bad.
CPUSA
Well-Known Member
Exactly what Kennedy said...
any other problems, or just the one clarified?
WingsOfGold
Well-Known Member
The freak? The hell you say.
OccamsRazor
Well-Known Member
Was this thread created specifically for future news about the title? Huh?? Or was the OP edited?
This ^^
Gurps is making topic threads to keep things together instead of making a new thread for every bit of news or commentary.
OccamsRazor
Well-Known Member
Preemptive? Just wondering why not create the thread.. you know... when the news actually happens...
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
If wat they are doing about Covid isn't any better than what they have already done about Covid, maybe it should be nuked.
As far as i know no one has ever beaten the common cold or any other Virus,. It appears they need to give it another try with a whole new attitude.
Certainly no one wants to stop programs that are successful, but I don't see how they can call the Covid fiasco successful.
As far as i know no one has ever beaten the common cold or any other Virus,. It appears they need to give it another try with a whole new attitude.
Certainly no one wants to stop programs that are successful, but I don't see how they can call the Covid fiasco successful.
The trouble began earlier, with corporate media’s hyperbolic “measles outbreak” story, which crescendoed last week following tragic news of the death of “a school-age child.” One who, I am confident, had multiple co-morbidities and probably died with measles, not from measles, but they won’t say. Patient privacy.The cumulative media pressure on Kennedy was enormous. After all, he’d just canceled the annual influenza vaccine committee. He was vulnerable to attack— and so the Deep State struck. Yesterday, Politico reported a story headlined, “Top HHS spokesperson quits after clashing with RFK Jr.
On Friday, Thomas Corry, Kennedy’s brand-new Public Affairs Director, “abruptly quit after clashing with Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his close aides over their management of the agency amid a growing measles outbreak.”
An anonymous HHS leaker blabbed to the Hill that Corry was “the one adult in the room that I saw, unfortunately.”
Two days after Corry rage-quit, Kennedy published his pro-MMR editorial. The next day, yesterday, his principal deputy chief of staff and long-time confidante, Stefanie Spear, sent a statement calling the measles outbreak “a top priority for Secretary Kennedy.”
Obviously, there is a battle raging within HHS, fueled by a media firestorm in the form of a giant burning wicker child. Kennedy made a bad choice in picking Corry. (We can’t even judge that too harshly; for all we know, he was forced to agree to Corry as one of many promises he made to survive Senate confirmation.)
As we discussed yesterday, the Democrats are acting like roadkill, salivating over the first Trump Administration misstep, to launch a narrative counterattack aimed at sanding the Agenda’s machine. Looking at all these facts, it seems the Trump Team maybe reached the difficult conclusion that discretion is the better part of valor. They extracted the canines from the rabid measles narrative before it could strap on its covid face mask.
Switching metaphors, chess sometimes requires sacrificing a piece. On Sunday, Kennedy may have strategically sacrificed a pawnish op-ed, a strategic compromise to quell the swelling counterattack that could have escaped HHS and infected the rest of Trump’s plans.
Either way, it is far too soon to throw the unvaccinated baby out with the pharmaceutical bathwater. Talk, as they say, is cheap. The Administration has plenty of political capital to spend. Perhaps we should hold fire and wait to see what the new Secretary does.
I realize it’s unsatisfying to constantly chalk up baffling missteps to “3-D chess.” But after all, it is true that in chess, a pawn’s sacrifice can set up a series of moves to reach a decisive checkmate and end the game. Nobody said draining the Swamp would to be easy. We must wait and see how this particular gambit pays off—assuming it does.
There was, however, plenty of other good news yesterday.
☕️ FAR AWAY ☙ Tuesday, March 4, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Robert Kennedy's pro-jab editorial; Zelensky's foot-in-mouth disease; Trump's pause on Kiev military aid; Europe's dilly-dallying; Newsom copies President Trump; tariffs slam on; Trump address; more.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
CBS ran a very encouraging story yesterday headlined, “RFK Jr. warns vaccinating poultry for bird flu could backfire.” Because, I mean, what could go wrong with that plan?
According to new HHS Secretary Kennedy, “Federal health agencies oppose the use of bird flu vaccines in poultry right now.” It was a “a sharp turn from the Biden administration” since, as CBS reported, “U.S. Department of Agriculture officials said last month that they were ramping up planning on potentially deploying a vaccine for poultry.”
“There's no indication that those vaccines actually provide sterilizing immunity, and all three of my health agencies — NIH, CDC, and FDA — the acting heads of those agencies have all recommended against the use of the bird flu vaccine," Kennedy told Fox News this week.
Kennedy didn’t mince his words. Vaccinating chickens without sterilizing immunity, he warned, risks “turning those birds into mutant factories”—fueling dangerous viral mutations. It “could actually accelerate the jump to human beings,” Kennedy said.
In other words, science. Kennedy was not wrong.
The gold standard for how not to do mass poultry vaccination comes courtesy of a little pharmaceutical disaster called Marek’s disease—a chicken virus that used to be about as scary as the common cold. But in the 1970s, government-prodded farmers rolled out a leaky vaccine, meaning it didn’t provide sterilizing immunity—it just stopped chickens from dying while still letting the virus spread.
The lamentable result was, instead of snuffing out the disease as promised, the vaccine transformed Marek’s into an unstoppable monster. The germ mutated into multiple ultra-lethal strains, which would have quickly burned out in an unvaccinated herd (since dead hosts don’t spread much), but thanks to the magic of half-baked vaccination, those hyper-virulent strains thrived.
To this day, unvaccinated chickens drop dead from Marek’s within ten days of being exposed. The virus won. The chickens — and we — lost. But at least Big Pharma got a permanent customer base. Great job, $cience.
This evolutionary train wreck proved what should be painfully obvious by now: if you stop symptoms but not transmission, you’re not stopping the virus—you’re turning it into a supervillain. Leaky vaccines don’t “protect.” They breed stronger enemies. (Yes, for covid, too.)
Instead of solving Marek’s, the FDA locked chickens into permanent vaccine dependency—every new generation must be vaccinated, or they face instant death. And now, bureaucrats want to throw the dice again, but this time with bird flu, which has far more potential to jump to humans.
What could possibly go wrong?
Before you ask, not one of the articles about Kennedy’s decision mentioned the Marek’s disease disaster. Not one. But why would they? Because informing people was never the point. They’re protecting the narrative. Instead of using the obvious and on-point Marek’s example, media just quoted a bunch of unchallenged Chicken Little scientists who called Kennedy names. You really don’t hate the corporate media enough.
The best news is, I told you Kennedy was on track. Patience. Let the man work.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
According to new HHS Secretary Kennedy, “Federal health agencies oppose the use of bird flu vaccines in poultry right now.” It was a “a sharp turn from the Biden administration” since, as CBS reported, “U.S. Department of Agriculture officials said last month that they were ramping up planning on potentially deploying a vaccine for poultry.”
“There's no indication that those vaccines actually provide sterilizing immunity, and all three of my health agencies — NIH, CDC, and FDA — the acting heads of those agencies have all recommended against the use of the bird flu vaccine," Kennedy told Fox News this week.
Kennedy didn’t mince his words. Vaccinating chickens without sterilizing immunity, he warned, risks “turning those birds into mutant factories”—fueling dangerous viral mutations. It “could actually accelerate the jump to human beings,” Kennedy said.
In other words, science. Kennedy was not wrong.
The gold standard for how not to do mass poultry vaccination comes courtesy of a little pharmaceutical disaster called Marek’s disease—a chicken virus that used to be about as scary as the common cold. But in the 1970s, government-prodded farmers rolled out a leaky vaccine, meaning it didn’t provide sterilizing immunity—it just stopped chickens from dying while still letting the virus spread.
The lamentable result was, instead of snuffing out the disease as promised, the vaccine transformed Marek’s into an unstoppable monster. The germ mutated into multiple ultra-lethal strains, which would have quickly burned out in an unvaccinated herd (since dead hosts don’t spread much), but thanks to the magic of half-baked vaccination, those hyper-virulent strains thrived.
To this day, unvaccinated chickens drop dead from Marek’s within ten days of being exposed. The virus won. The chickens — and we — lost. But at least Big Pharma got a permanent customer base. Great job, $cience.
This evolutionary train wreck proved what should be painfully obvious by now: if you stop symptoms but not transmission, you’re not stopping the virus—you’re turning it into a supervillain. Leaky vaccines don’t “protect.” They breed stronger enemies. (Yes, for covid, too.)
Instead of solving Marek’s, the FDA locked chickens into permanent vaccine dependency—every new generation must be vaccinated, or they face instant death. And now, bureaucrats want to throw the dice again, but this time with bird flu, which has far more potential to jump to humans.
What could possibly go wrong?
Before you ask, not one of the articles about Kennedy’s decision mentioned the Marek’s disease disaster. Not one. But why would they? Because informing people was never the point. They’re protecting the narrative. Instead of using the obvious and on-point Marek’s example, media just quoted a bunch of unchallenged Chicken Little scientists who called Kennedy names. You really don’t hate the corporate media enough.
The best news is, I told you Kennedy was on track. Patience. Let the man work.
☕️ MOTIVES ☙ Friday, March 7, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Spot the psyop; FBI’s inglorious history; red flag attacks; Bondi’s Epstein slow-roll; Trump siloes Ukraine; Germany spends like drunken backpfeifengesicht; Newsom pod-mauled; RFK blocks bird vaxx...
www.coffeeandcovid.com