Trump Admin - Visa Holders
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
View attachment 186310
Trump administration’s reasons for detaining Mahmoud Khalil threaten free speech
It’s been three days since the government arrested and detained Mahmoud Khalil for deportation. This afternoon, the administration finally stated the basis for its actions. Its explanation threatens the free speech of millions of people.
Yesterday, an administration official told The Free Press, “The allegation here is not that [Khalil] was breaking the law.” This was confirmed today by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, who announced Khalil is being targeted under a law that she characterized as allowing the secretary of state to personally deem individuals “adversarial to the foreign policy and national security interests of the United States of America.”
Leavitt said Khalil “sid[ed] with terrorists,” “organized group protests” that “disrupted college campus classes and harassed Jewish American students and made them feel unsafe,” and distributed “pro-Hamas propaganda.” She also said the Department of Homeland Security is trying to track down “other individuals who have engaged in pro-Hamas activity” at Columbia University.
The law Leavitt appears to be citing requires the secretary of state to have "reasonable ground to believe” the person’s “presence or activities in the United States . . . would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.”
Trump administration’s reasons for detaining Mahmoud Khalil threaten free speech
It’s been three days since the government arrested and detained Mahmoud Khalil for deportation. This afternoon, the administration finally stated the basis for its actions. Its explanation threatens the free speech of millions of people.
Yesterday, an administration official told The Free Press, “The allegation here is not that [Khalil] was breaking the law.” This was confirmed today by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, who announced Khalil is being targeted under a law that she characterized as allowing the secretary of state to personally deem individuals “adversarial to the foreign policy and national security interests of the United States of America.”
Leavitt said Khalil “sid[ed] with terrorists,” “organized group protests” that “disrupted college campus classes and harassed Jewish American students and made them feel unsafe,” and distributed “pro-Hamas propaganda.” She also said the Department of Homeland Security is trying to track down “other individuals who have engaged in pro-Hamas activity” at Columbia University.
The law Leavitt appears to be citing requires the secretary of state to have "reasonable ground to believe” the person’s “presence or activities in the United States . . . would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.”
Student Visas
CLOSED BORDER: The Trump administration maintains that obtaining a student visa to study in the US is a privilege, not a right. Consequently, the administration is revoking visas for students with open hostility toward America. Is that a justified reason for removal? While reasonable people may disagree, I believe the U.S. should welcome the best and brightest students—but only if they appreciate and respect this country at least as much as their own. Badar Khan Suri likely got caught up in his wife's (Mapheze Saleh) politics - her father is a senior advisor to a Palestinian terror group - and as a result he is being sent home. Ironically, Saleh is an American citizen and is free to hate her country - which she does with a passion.
CLOSED BORDER: The Trump administration maintains that obtaining a student visa to study in the US is a privilege, not a right. Consequently, the administration is revoking visas for students with open hostility toward America. Is that a justified reason for removal? While reasonable people may disagree, I believe the U.S. should welcome the best and brightest students—but only if they appreciate and respect this country at least as much as their own. Badar Khan Suri likely got caught up in his wife's (Mapheze Saleh) politics - her father is a senior advisor to a Palestinian terror group - and as a result he is being sent home. Ironically, Saleh is an American citizen and is free to hate her country - which she does with a passion.
Right to return: A Palestinian migrant and activist agitator at Columbia University has been detained by U.S. immigration officials, sparking fury from leftists who say this is "zionist fascism."
Mahmoud Khalil
- The X post responds to Will Chamberlain's claim about Mahmoud Khalil's deportation, arguing it’s defamatory and legally inaccurate, as only an immigration judge can revoke a permanent resident's status, not the Department of State as suggested.
- It ties the situation to the influence of the "Israel lobby," referencing broader allegations of their impact on U.S. policies and institutions, as discussed in related threads and web results about pro-Israel advocacy groups.
- Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate student and Palestinian activist, was detained by ICE on March 9, 2025, with his green card status reportedly revoked due to his involvement in pro-Palestinian protests, sparking legal and public debate.
green card revocation
Post analysis currently uses a smaller model.
Based on the context of your query, the X posts, and the related web results, here’s a detailed explanation of green card (lawful permanent resident, or LPR) revocation, particularly in relation to Mahmoud Khalil’s situation mentioned in the <TARGET_POST_TO_ANALYZE> (Post ID: 1899002087549329778) and the broader discussion in the threads.
What is a Green Card and Lawful Permanent Resident Status?
A green card grants lawful permanent residency (LPR) in the United States, allowing individuals to live and work in the U.S. indefinitely, provided they comply with immigration laws. Green card holders have rights (e.g., protection under U.S. laws, ability to work legally) and responsibilities (e.g., filing taxes, supporting the democratic system, not committing removable offenses).
Grounds for Green Card Revocation
According to the web results and U.S. immigration law (as outlined by USCIS and other sources), a green card can be revoked under specific circumstances. The key grounds include:
- Criminal Convictions:
- Conviction of certain serious crimes can lead to revocation. These include offenses like drug trafficking, domestic violence, or crimes involving "moral turpitude" (e.g., fraud, theft). Even a single conviction for such crimes can trigger immigration consequences, potentially leading to removal (deportation) and loss of LPR status (Web Result 3).
- Immigration Fraud or Misrepresentation:
- Providing false information or documents during the green card application process (e.g., falsifying employment history, marital status, or other eligibility criteria) can result in revocation (Web Result 3).
- Violating Immigration Laws:
- Green card holders must adhere to immigration regulations, such as maintaining continuous residence in the U.S. or working legally. Violations, like failing to maintain residency or working without authorization, can lead to revocation (Web Result 3).
- Endorsement of Terrorist Activity or Threats to Public Safety:
- Under U.S. immigration law, non-citizens (including green card holders) can be deemed removable if they engage in, endorse, or espouse terrorist activity or activities that endanger public safety. This is referenced in Will Chamberlain’s post (quoted in the target post) and is tied to Section 212(a)(3)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which defines "terrorist activity" as including acts that threaten violence, harm, or endanger national security (Web Result 0, though not directly cited, aligns with this legal framework).
- Rescission of Adjustment of Status:
- If USCIS determines that a person was not eligible for adjustment to LPR status at the time of approval, they can initiate rescission proceedings. This process requires USCIS to serve the individual and potentially lead to revocation of naturalization or LPR status. However, rescission is subject to specific procedures, and USCIS typically does not initiate it if the adjustment was granted by an immigration judge (Web Result 0).
- Authority: Only an immigration judge has the authority to revoke a green card and order deportation. This is a critical point in the target post, where ZMT @ZMTabloid argues that Will Chamberlain’s claim is defamatory and legally inaccurate, as only an immigration judge—not ICE, the Department of State, or other entities—can revoke LPR status after a fair trial or hearing.
- Due Process: Green card holders are entitled to due process, including a hearing before an immigration judge, where they can present evidence and challenge allegations. This is emphasized in the target post and web results (Web Results 1, 2, and 3).
- ICE Detention: While ICE can detain a green card holder suspected of removable offenses (as in Mahmoud Khalil’s case), the actual revocation of residency requires a judicial process, not an executive or administrative decision alone.
- Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate student and Palestinian activist, was detained by ICE on March 9, 2025, with reports suggesting his green card was being revoked due to his organization of anti-Israel protests. Will Chamberlain’s post (quoted in the target post) claims Khalil’s deportation is justified because he allegedly endorsed or espoused "terrorist activity" as a non-citizen, citing U.S. immigration law.
- ZMT @ZMTabloid counters this, arguing that Chamberlain’s statement is defamatory and legally incorrect. They assert that Khalil, as a permanent resident, is entitled to a fair trial, and only an immigration judge can revoke his residency. The post also ties this to the influence of the "Israel lobby," suggesting political motivations behind the action, as part of a broader pattern of targeting pro-Palestinian activists (as seen in Threads 1, 2, and 4).
- Web Result 0 (USCIS Rescission Process): Describes the process for rescinding LPR status, noting that USCIS can initiate proceedings if eligibility is in question, but this doesn’t automatically revoke status—it requires formal action, often involving an immigration judge.
- Web Result 1 (Rights and Responsibilities): Highlights that LPRs can live permanently in the U.S. unless they commit actions making them removable under immigration law, reinforcing the need for a legal process.
- Web Result 2 (Green Card via Immigration Judge): Confirms that if an immigration judge granted LPR status, USCIS doesn’t typically initiate rescission, and any revocation must follow judicial proceedings.
- Web Result 3 (Grounds for Revocation): Lists specific grounds (crimes, fraud, immigration violations) that could lead to revocation, but emphasizes that such actions require legal proceedings, not arbitrary decisions.
- The X threads (e.g., Threads 1, 2, 4) suggest a narrative that pro-Israel advocacy groups (e.g., funded by individuals like Adam Milstein, Bill Ackman, or the Adelsons) influence U.S. policies, institutions, and public opinion to target pro-Palestinian activists like Khalil. The target post specifically accuses the "Israel lobby" and figures like Senator Marco Rubio of fueling this "ordeal."
- The posts allege a coordinated effort involving funding, legal actions (e.g., frivolous lawsuits), and public campaigns to suppress free speech and target individuals critical of Israel, tying Khalil’s detention to this broader pattern.
Green card revocation is a serious legal process governed by U.S. immigration law, requiring due process and a hearing before an immigration judge. In Mahmoud Khalil’s case, as argued in the target post, his detention by ICE and the alleged revocation of his green card cannot occur without a fair trial, contradicting Will Chamberlain’s claim. The X posts and web results indicate that allegations of endorsing terrorist activity or other removable offenses must be proven in court, not assumed or acted upon unilaterally. The broader discussion suggests political motivations, potentially influenced by pro-Israel advocacy groups, though these claims would require further legal and factual scrutiny.
If you have specific questions about Khalil’s case, the legal process, or the role of advocacy groups, feel free to ask for more detailed analysis!
You should be good, just don't try that Dinner's Club card... eekI'm a Visa holder. Also a Mastercard holder. Do I need to be worried??
(I'm thinking it was the "First" credit card issued to the public)
Israel Protest Organizer ARRESTED, Faces Deportation, Democrats FURIOUS Over Mahmoud Khalil Arrest
It Sure Looks Like the Trump Admin Just Outfoxed the Judge Trying to Block Pro-Hamas Leader's Deportation
Khalil is originally from Syria and has been one of the leaders of the antisemitic harassment campaign taking place at Columbia University. During the summer of 2024, he helped instigate and organize a group of Hamas supporters who illegally occupied public spaces around the school, becoming one of their chief "negotiators." Columbia pro-terrorist activists made headlines again recently when they surrounded a Jewish center on campus, screaming for a "global intifada." Khalil was also filmed participating in a "protest" that took over a library.
[clip]
That seems pretty straightforward, but nothing is ever cut and dried when left-wing judges make it their life's mission to oppose everything the Trump administration does. Judge Jesse M. Furman of the Southern District of New York stepped in to block Khalil's deportation and ordered legal representation for both sides to appear on Wednesday.
View attachment 186265
Here's where things get interesting, though, because it appears the Trump administration may have outfoxed the judge in this case. According to reports, Khalil was moved to an ICE detention center in Louisiana. Why is that important? Because while Furman issued his order based on Khalil's New York petition for habeas corpus (i.e., that he be released pending further litigation), the law requires that the petition be filed in the federal court district the subject is being held in. If Khalil isn't in New York anymore, and it seems fairly certain he isn't, then Furman has no jurisdiction over the case.
Experienced former federal prosecutor and RedState contributor Shipwreckedcrew concurred with that interpretation, saying the following on social media.
It sure seems like the Trump administration just did an end-around a Barack Obama-appointed judge. Whether Furman will acknowledge that is another question. He may try some other administrative gambit to remain involved in the case, though as a non-lawyer, I'm not sure what that would be. For now, though, it seems Khalil's deportation is very much back on the table.
And that's that.
Just because Democrats love Islamic terrorists doesn't mean everyone does.
