Two Black Men Arrested At Philly Starbucks Break Silence

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
"We were there for a real reason, a real deal that we were working on," said Robinson. "We put in a lot of time, energy, effort. ... We were at a moment that could have a positive impact on a whole ladder of people, lives, families. So I was like, 'No, you’re not stopping that right now.'"

[clip]

The attorney representing Nelson and Robinson says they were racially profiled by the store, a violation of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. AP reports that the two men are currently in mediation proceedings with the company "to implement changes, including the posting in stores of a customer bill of rights; the adoption of new policies regarding customer ejections, racial profiling and racial discrimination; and independent investigations of complaints of profiling or discrimination from customers and employees."

:killingme


https://www.dailywire.com/news/29621/two-black-men-arrested-philly-starbucks-break-james-barrett


Entitlement mentality ... when the Police ask you to step off, you step off ...
... have your conversion on the sidewalk

reenter when your 3rd party arrives and purchase something



someone just won the Ghetto Lottery .... waiting to get paid I'd say
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
We were told at first that two black men sat down at a table, and, out of nowhere, for no reason other than their race, were summarily perp walked out of the establishment by an army of police officers. This already made little sense for a number of reasons, including the fact that the incident occurred at a store in Philadelphia. The store presumably sees hundreds of black customers every week. If it was in the habit of having black people randomly arrested, why is this the first time we're hearing about it?

Then more information came out. It was discovered that this particular location has a problem with loitering (not surprising for a restaurant in an urban area), and the manager in question has had potentially dangerous altercations with loiterers in the past. Then we find out that the two men were warned that the cops would be coming and they responded, "Go ahead and call them. We don't care."

A couple of days later, Ben Shapiro revealed that the manager, Holly, is an "SJW feminist of the highest order," according to a regular customer at that location. Certainly not the picture of a slobbering, uncontrollable racial bigot who hates black people so much that she reports them to the police without provocation.

Finally, over the past several hours, two additional details have come to the surface:

1) The 911 call placed by Holly, in which she says, very reasonably, "I have two gentlemen in my cafe that are refusing to make a purchase or leave.” This is significant because it confirms that the men were given the option to at least buy something and, incredibly, they refused.

2) Their own testimony, which they gave to "Good Morning America" on Thursday. According to their own version, they walked into the store, grabbed a table, and then asked to use the restroom. The manager told them that they had to buy something to use it. They declined, and went back to sit at the table without having purchased anything. Now that they had called attention to themselves, the manager was aware of their presence and aware that they were not paying customers. She approached them and offered to get them drinks or anything else they might want. They declined. They were asked to leave and they declined. The police came and asked them to leave and they declined. This is their own version.

When asked on "Good Morning America" how they would respond to people who say they broke the rules by loitering and not buying anything, their lawyer declared that Starbucks is a "place to meet." In other words, they have decided that this private establishment is more like a camping ground or a public park. A person is entitled to take up seats in a busy restaurant without buying so much as a $2 coffee in order to earn the privilege. The Starbucks CEO, who has spent all week cowering to the mob and throwing his innocent store manager under the bus, has now affirmed this interpretation. He may very well have destroyed his business in the process. :yay: So be it.


https://www.dailywire.com/news/29625/walsh-story-starbucks-entitlement-not-racism-matt-walsh




awesome .... seats taken up by legions of NON Paying Customers
watch paying whitey flee
 
Last edited:

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
We were told at first that two black men sat down at a table, and, out of nowhere, for no reason other than their race, were summarily perp walked out of the establishment by an army of police officers. This already made little sense for a number of reasons, including the fact that the incident occurred at a store in Philadelphia. The store presumably sees hundreds of black customers every week. If it was in the habit of having black people randomly arrested, why is this the first time we're hearing about it?

Then more information came out. It was discovered that this particular location has a problem with loitering (not surprising for a restaurant in an urban area), and the manager in question has had potentially dangerous altercations with loiterers in the past. Then we find out that the two men were warned that the cops would be coming and they responded, "Go ahead and call them. We don't care."

A couple of days later, Ben Shapiro revealed that the manager, Holly, is an "SJW feminist of the highest order," according to a regular customer at that location. Certainly not the picture of a slobbering, uncontrollable racial bigot who hates black people so much that she reports them to the police without provocation.

Finally, over the past several hours, two additional details have come to the surface:

1) The 911 call placed by Holly, in which she says, very reasonably, "I have two gentlemen in my cafe that are refusing to make a purchase or leave.” This is significant because it confirms that the men were given the option to at least buy something and, incredibly, they refused.

2) Their own testimony, which they gave to "Good Morning America" on Thursday. According to their own version, they walked into the store, grabbed a table, and then asked to use the restroom. The manager told them that they had to buy something to use it. They declined, and went back to sit at the table without having purchased anything. Now that they had called attention to themselves, the manager was aware of their presence and aware that they were not paying customers. She approached them and offered to get them drinks or anything else they might want. They declined. They were asked to leave and they declined. The police came and asked them to leave and they declined. This is their own version.


https://www.dailywire.com/news/29625/walsh-story-starbucks-entitlement-not-racism-matt-walsh

They are in mediation to come up with a dollar amount Starbucks can pay to soothe their hurt feelings.
 

officeguy

Well-Known Member
Entitlement mentality ... when the Police ask you to step off, you step off ...
... have your conversion on the sidewalk

reenter when your 3rd party arrives and purchase something

Actually, no, when the manager of a business asks you to leave, you leave.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Couldn't happen to a nicer company. Watching the CEO grovel and play the "some of my best friends are black" card is priceless. And then there's the "reparation coffee" guy... :lmao:
 

Bonehead

Well-Known Member
I watched that interview, actually tried to keep and open mind and a shadow of a doubt about what actually happened.
Nope both those boys have about 3 ounces of brain between them typical white mans holding me down bull sheot.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I watched that interview, actually tried to keep and open mind and a shadow of a doubt about what actually happened.
Nope both those boys have about 3 ounces of brain between them typical white mans holding me down bull sheot.

They were there to save humanity and do a favor for humankind.

We were there for a real reason, a real deal that we were working on," said Robinson. "We put in a lot of time, energy, effort. ... We were at a moment that could have a positive impact on a whole ladder of people, lives, families. So I was like, 'No, you’re not stopping that right now.'"
 

black dog

Free America
They are in mediation to come up with a dollar amount Starbucks can pay to soothe their hurt feelings.

Yep, They will actually looking into buying property when this is over because then they will actually have money to invest in property..
 

officeguy

Well-Known Member
Mh, a 'deal' they were working on. Apparently the budget for the deal didn't include $5 for two cups of drip coffee to pay for the meeting room they were planning to use.
 

Merlin99

Visualize whirled peas
PREMO Member
Couldn't happen to a nicer company. Watching the CEO grovel and play the "some of my best friends are black" card is priceless. And then there's the "reparation coffee" guy... :lmao:

I hope they go under and a less emo coffee house takes over.
 

Clem72

Well-Known Member
awesome .... seats taken up by legions of NON Paying Customers
watch paying whitey flee
Wasn't Starbucks the place they decided to make a big hullabaloo about opening bathrooms to non-paying customers? I bet they make more money from the coffee products they sell in grocery stores then their actual coffee houses, so they probably care more about projecting a certain image then being profitable in those locations.
 
Top