U-2 spy plane soldiers on after nearly 60 years

nhboy

Ubi bene ibi patria
Link to original article.

" OSAN AIR BASE, South Korea — While high-tech drones and satellites get most of the attention as eyes in the sky, the U.S. military here continues to rely heavily on the U-2 — a Cold War relic that’s hard to fly and lands with help from a car trailing it down the runway.

“I think most people’s reaction is: `Oh, we still fly U-2s?,’ ” said Lt. Col. Deric Kraxberger, commander of the 5th Reconnaissance Squadron, who has flown the bulky birds for about a decade and embraces the challenges they bring.

“The aircraft is built with a very small structural margin of safety,” he said. “It’s fragile. She’s a challenge … a handful. You never get complacent flying the U-2. At altitude, you feel very isolated and very small. Down low, it’s a lot of work. It flies like a truck without power steering … so you’re muscling the aircraft through the air.”

The U-2, nicknamed “The Dragon Lady,” was first put into use in the mid-1950s at the height of the Cold War to spy on the Soviet Union, China and other Communist nations. In 1960, one was shot down over Soviet territory; another was shot down over Cuba in 1962.

Government and military officials have talked for years about putting the U-2 out to pasture, replacing it — in part or entirely — with drones and other more modern surveillance equipment. "

.....

" The U-2, capable of flying for up to 12 hours, climbs rapidly and spends much of its time above 63,000 feet, what’s known as “Armstrong’s Line,” he said.

At altitudes sometimes in excess of 70,000 feet — about twice that of commercial flights — U-2 pilots can see the curvature of the earth and the terminator, the dividing line between day and night, he said.

“I have personally experienced a meteor shower, where the meteors were burning out below the aircraft,” the commander said.

Kraxberger explained that the information gathered is relayed to a mission control-like crew of intelligence analysts on the ground which could number “in the hundreds.”

“We have a preplanned route, but we’re flexible enough to alter that if something catches our eye,” Kraxberger said. “That’s part of intelligence gathering – finding out what you don’t know; not necessarily confirming what you do.” "
 

Railroad

Routinely Derailed
The U-2 and the B-52 are a tremendous value for the amount spent in acquiring them. Although keeping them aloft all these years has no doubt been a challenge, the tasks successfully accomplished so many times over have delivered huge dividends. They're examples of what happens when the government and contractor team up to achieve a common goal.
 

itsbob

I bowl overhand
I thought the U-2 was replaced with the TR 1 in the early 80's? Very similar planes but the TR1 was (I thought) a new airframe
 

glhs837

Power with Control
Bob, looks like there were about 30 TR-1s built, new airframes built in the early 80s. But after the fall of the USSR, they were redesignated as U-2S aircraft.

So, are we flying those airframes from the 50s? No, I dont think so.
 

flomaster

J.F. A sus ordenes!
I am fortunate to see them flying on a regular basis. Love the history behind these great planes.

:buddies:
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
The U-2 and the B-52 are a tremendous value for the amount spent in acquiring them. Although keeping them aloft all these years has no doubt been a challenge,

I have read a few anecdotal stories, sons flying the same B-52s their day did ....


and there was something recent about the BUFF's getting another round of upgrades
 

edinsomd

New Member
Bob, looks like there were about 30 TR-1s built, new airframes built in the early 80s. But after the fall of the USSR, they were redesignated as U-2S aircraft.

So, are we flying those airframes from the 50s? No, I dont think so.

Remember the U-2's that weren't in our hangar in Sigonella for GW-1? Damn those things were loud taking off, and the chase trucks racing after them on landing was a sight.
Good thing they were never there.
:whistle:
 

glhs837

Power with Control
Remember the U-2's that weren't in our hangar in Sigonella for GW-1? Damn those things were loud taking off, and the chase trucks racing after them on landing was a sight.
Good thing they were never there.
:whistle:



I cant say as I recall any aircraft that were not there, or were behind big fabric walls taking up half our hangar deck
 

edinsomd

New Member
You couldn't see the aircraft that weren't there from the duty office window on the second deck. Or so I've been told...
 

cwo_ghwebb

No Use for Donk Twits
Spent four years at Osan in the mid-80s. Loved the El Camino chase trucks running the planes down putting up the wing wheels.
 
Top