Democrats losing their sht over activist judges committing illegal immigration crimes. 
Wait, I thought no one was above the law?
- Thread starter vraiblonde
- Start date
Democrats are above the law.Democrats losing their sht over activist judges committing illegal immigration crimes.
Never let a prominent job lead you to believe someone is intelligent.
Rashida Talib is a lawyer and has a doctorate.
The only thing needed to be a lawyer these days is to be morally bankrupt and a bullshit artist.
22AcaciaAve
Well-Known Member
If this judge did that it is totally ridiculous. She should be removed from the judiciary.
As far as activist judges go, have some of them gone too far? Probably. That's why we have a hierarchical judiciary system. A lower judge rules, don't like it, appeal it at the next level. Eventually it gets to the highest court in the land. Exactly how our democracy works.
There are many judges, many courts. There is only one President. If you allow the President to ignore judiciary rulings, without going through the legal chain, you have effectively made one man a king. That is what our founding fathers were preventing when they authored the constitution.
That has not happened at this point. I hope it never does. Eventually there will be a democrat back in the president's office and a democratic congress. I cannot imagine the pendulum shift and destruction that will happen if the rule of law from the courts is broken down.
As far as activist judges go, have some of them gone too far? Probably. That's why we have a hierarchical judiciary system. A lower judge rules, don't like it, appeal it at the next level. Eventually it gets to the highest court in the land. Exactly how our democracy works.
There are many judges, many courts. There is only one President. If you allow the President to ignore judiciary rulings, without going through the legal chain, you have effectively made one man a king. That is what our founding fathers were preventing when they authored the constitution.
That has not happened at this point. I hope it never does. Eventually there will be a democrat back in the president's office and a democratic congress. I cannot imagine the pendulum shift and destruction that will happen if the rule of law from the courts is broken down.
Fixed.
Rightturn On Red
New Member
Already happened during Biden's term.
I do not recall any other president having to go through "the legal chain" when they did an EO or, you know, directed people to follow the law.
This is obstruction, pure and simple. Democrats are trying to run out the clock.
These laws are already on the books. It's not the "legal chain" when some pissant no authority judge says, "Oh I'm sorry, you can't enforce the law, you have to let people break the law for another however long it takes to go up the chain and the Supremes finally say the law must be obeyed."
Obama deported millions of illegals and nobody disputed it.....BECAUSE IT'S ALREADY THE LAW. Illegal aliens, especially the ones who are committing violent crimes, aren't entitled to due process. They're not citizens and they are in the country illegally, AND them even being here is....let's say it together....AGAINST THE LAW.
I appreciate that you give your take somewhat rationally, but you're still wrong. All Trump is doing is enforcing the laws that are already in place. These judges are outright breaking the law.
That already happened during the Biden administration.
If? It happened in front of many witnesses in that court room.
At issue is the "scope" of lower court rulings. The jurisdiction of the lower courts is that at most they can rule on a specific case before them or within their specific jurisdiction. They have no authority to rule beyond that scope and impose nation-wide rulings. And they are bound by the separation of power doctrine and must give deference to such separation. That is how our REPUBLIC is supposed to work.
Really? Then you should be able to show the specific portion of the Constitution that states that.
The "rule of law" has been destroyed. It started when the Marshall court "implied" that they had authority for "judicial review" in Marbury v, Madison even though the Constitution nowhere gives them such authority.
What's most interesting to me is the absolute obedience these people have to the Democrat Party. Judges will BREAK THE FREAKING LAW to do the bidding of their masters. Several judges have come right out and said they don't care about the law, they'll happily go to jail for breaking the laws they don't like. They are dying for the chance to prove their loyalty.
Actual lawmakers - state and federal - some of whom literally made the laws they are now desperate to break....
And half the country applauds this and tries to justify it. It's crazy.
Actual lawmakers - state and federal - some of whom literally made the laws they are now desperate to break....
And half the country applauds this and tries to justify it. It's crazy.
LtownTaxpayer
Well-Known Member
ID-10Ts - all of them!!!
LtownTaxpayer
Well-Known Member
What you fail to acknowledge is that this is slowing down everything for no reason other than the "judges" are fulfilling their democratic party duty - NOT their judicial duty. I would LOVE if judges were graded based on how many of their decisions were overturned on appeal. If they had a sanction for poor performance based on how many of their ridiculous decisions were overturned, things could get interesting. Also lifetime appointments can really suck when the judge is an activist.
Bottom line I do NOT understand how a judge at the lowest federal level can rule for the entire country - bullsh!t!! Also if someone entered our country illegally, they did not follow due process. So they should get the same consideration to LEAVE.
Last edited:
22AcaciaAve
Well-Known Member
I absolutely agree with you. Judges who are lifetime appointments have free passes. That is not right. But a judge at the lowest level ruling only means you appeal to a higher court until you get to the supreme court. That is the way our constitution was designed and that is the way you beat the lower court judges. There is frustration now on the MAGA side because it is perceived as slowing down deportation. And that may be true. But think of it this way, if the democrats had full control and instituted a full out assault on the 2nd amendment and began to confiscate guns, wouldn't gun owners want a lower court judge to slow the process down?
BTW, don't think this hasn't been discussed by democrats sitting on the sidelines. Because it has.
A judge exists solely to render decisions based on the rule of law - they are not there to insert their feelings or opinions or God help us - support their PARTY. Certainly there have been decisions handed down that go against the judge’s personal beliefs, but he’s limited to what the law allows.
This is outrageous because the judge has judged the law itself.
This is outrageous because the judge has judged the law itself.
But that takes forever and Democrats are getting some corrupt pissant judge to jump in on everything. Republicans didn't do that to Biden, or any other president. Democrats haven't done it to any other president. When Obama deported however many million illegals do you know how many Republicans - or Democrats, for that matter - jumped in and demanded he go through a judicial process for each and every one of them?
Zero.
We have immigration laws on the books. These activist corrupt judges are ruling....that we shouldn't obey the laws.
That's exactly what they're doing - saying law enforcement has no right to enforce laws.So a couple of things about that:
Democrat Governors are doing exactly that in many states. And no I'm not going to look it up for you. If you cared about truth you'd already know. I could post links out the ass and you wouldn't even look at them.
Also, the Second Amendment is part of our Constitution. It's in the Bill of Rights. And not far after that there's an amendment that says states cannot take away the rights of the People that are granted in the Constitution. We have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms; foreign nationals do not have a constitutional right to enter our country illegally and commit violent crimes.
Foreigners entering our country illegally and harming American citizens is an invasion. If the Russian army landed in DC and started killing people, would you say there had to be a judicial process for each and every one of them to remove them? Because it's the same thing. You can pooh pooh and say it's not, but it is. Foreign nationals entering our country illegally, killing and raping American citizens. That's what it is. The end.
When your cult leaders tell you these violent illegal aliens are just poor misunderstood cherubs, they're lying to you. This "Maryland Man" that you all seem to worship is an El Salvadoran gang member and human trafficker, not to mention a wife beater. Your masters will show you a photo of Nicholas Sandmann literally just standing there and tell you he's a horrible racist who deserves to be punished, yet they blur out the photos of violent criminal illegal aliens that are surrounding the White House.
Are you that sucked into the cult that you can't be even slightly reasonable?