Warren UNIVERSAL Child Care Coverage

[GURPS]

The broad strokes of the plan-- which would cover 12 million children-- would mean no family would have to spend more than seven percent of its total household income, according to The Huffington Post, which first reported on the announcement. The report said the number is based off a Department of Health and Human Services figure on what qualifies as affordable child care.

The plan is still being worked on, but sources told the news outlet that they expect it to cost about $700 billion in new funding over 10 years, or four times what the federal government pays on these programs.

Warren set to release $70B-per-year plan for universal child care, will tap wealth tax

Elizabeth Warren, the Democratic senator from Massachusetts, is expected to announce a plan Tuesday that would fund universal child care by tapping into revenue from her wealth tax proposal, reports said.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Clem72]

Would really depend on the details, but the way I see it poor people already get free childcare and pre-school, where the rest of the community pays like $5k-$10k per child per year. Poor people also have more children in the US (it's a fact, google sensus statistics by income, the higher the income the lower the number of dependants).

So this would just be slightly leveling the playing field for those of middle income (limiting childcare to 7% of income).

 

[Salmon]

The right opposes abortion. They just don’t want to pay the rising costs associated of additional bodies in the household.

 

[vraiblonde]

What is her plan to get methed out dirtbag "parents" to take their child in for medical care?

REMINDER:

That kid in DC who "died of a toothache"? That was bullshit. His crack whore mother was within walking distance to a free clinic and she couldn't get off her worthless ass to take him. Instead she let him suffer until he died of infection.

That story was used to push Obamacare and it was a complete lie.

 

[GURPS]

The right opposes MURDER

:fixed:

They just don’t want to pay the rising costs associated of additional bodies in the household.

YOUR Personal Problems are no concern of mine, you don't want me in YOUR Bed Room, do not as my help paying for self created Problems

 

[This_person]

The right opposes abortion. They just don’t want to pay the rising costs associated of additional bodies in the household.

The left would rather kill people than live with the consequences of their actions.

Not sure why you would think additional bodies in someone's household is someone else's responsibility, but they are not.

 

[Salmon]

Yes, I think society does bear some responsibility for helping offset the insane cost of having a kid. Do you suggest lower income families refrain from reproduction?

 

[LightRoasted]

If I may ...

Another band-aid solution that is caused by the problem that is inflation caused by the Federal Reserve System. aka Kicking the can down the road.

 

[GURPS]

Yes NO Raising YOUR Child is YOUR Responsibility otherwise Society has a say in how that child is raised.

Margret Sanger had the right Idea ...

 

[This_person]

Yes, I think society does bear some responsibility for helping offset the insane cost of having a kid. Do you suggest lower income families refrain from reproduction?

Reproduction they cannot afford? Absolutely. Yes.

If they can't afford a 2500 sq ft home, I suggest they live in 1000 sq ft. If they can't afford a Lincoln, I suggest they drive a Fiesta. If they can't afford a third kid, I suggest they not have a third kid.

Since they are part of society, they are part of bearing the responsibility for funding children - THEIR children are who they are responsible for. MY kids are who I am responsible for. Just like my house and my car.

 

[vraiblonde]

Do you suggest lower income families refrain from reproduction?

Well...yes. That would be the logical and sensible thing to do.

Now you're just being a troll and I find that boring, so I will zen you out.

 

[Toxick]

The right opposes abortion. They just don’t want to pay the rising costs associated of additional bodies in the household.

Well, from what I hear from Pro-Choice people is that they also oppose abortion. They just think it should be legal.




So, am I to understand that you like the idea of turning children into liverwurst? Or are you saying everyone on the left is full of horse-crap?

 

[Toxick]

full of horse-crap?

The ****?

I didn't write "crap"

 

[Chris0nllyn]

The ****?

I didn't write "crap"

You can't type that, but you can type "shitty".

"Horse-Shitty"

 

[Monello]

The right opposes abortion. They just don’t want to pay the rising costs associated of additional bodies in the household.

The problem with the government stepping in is that they enable people to have more kids than they can financially support.

Exhibit #1 Angel Adams Brown - has enough kids to man a football team, a basketball team and has a kid left over.

 

[Monello]

Yes, I think society does bear some responsibility for helping offset the insane cost of having a kid. Do you suggest lower income families refrain from reproduction?

How did people manage that for the past few centuries? Just the unintended consequences of LBJ's great society.

 

[Monello]

You can't type that, but you can type "shitty".

"Horse-Shitty"

Probably not for much longer. Thanks

 

[vraiblonde]

The ****?

I didn't write "crap"

It's magic.

Or God, depending on your predilections.

 

[Merlin99]

Yes, I think society does bear some responsibility for helping offset the insane cost of having a kid. Do you suggest lower income families refrain from reproduction?

Yes, yes, a thousand times yes.

 

[Hijinx]

Yes, I think society does bear some responsibility for helping offset the insane cost of having a kid. Do you suggest lower income families refrain from reproduction?

Yes

I refrained when I couldn't afford any more than the two I have. Why shouldn't the lower income people use the same common sense.?