"No, this isn't Socialism! It's just the death of capitalism!"
I just found the observations that were made to be interesting and true.
Exactly.I think this mess is just a bit more than a modest challenge.
"No, this isn't Socialism! It's just the death of capitalism!"
What you are seeing is one of the wealthiest, geographically advantaged productive capitalist societies in the world flounder and fail at its most basic test. Taking care of its people.
I was under the impression that a capitalist society isn't about "taking care of its people". It's about getting the goddam hell out of the ****ing way so the people can take care of themselves.
And if I'm being honest, from what I can see, the government did not facilitate that. At all. Indeed, it completely ****ing knee-capped it from the get-go and literally made it illegal for people to take care of themselves.
So basically, that entire diatribe is a grotesquely loquacious screed suggesting that "A capitalist society failed at a sick parody of socialism".
It also (as usual) conflates Corporatism and Capitalism. Something most socialists do without even thinking about it, or seeing why that's a steaming heap of disgusting feces.
Villification of the media?Interestingly enough...I found most of them to be flawed, skewed or bogus. Except for the last paragraph.
This is a once in a lifetime, global event.
"No, this isn't Socialism! It's just the death of capitalism!"
Exactly.
This is a once in a lifetime, global event. I doubt any company had a contingency plan for a world wide pandemic. I guess now some will.
I guess I knew it was bull when it postulated that the basic test was to take care of its people. It absolutely, positively is NOT.
To the best of MY understanding - that's what socialism purports to do, and aims to do by placing government in control of taking care of people.
What a government is supposed to do foremost is to PROTECT its people and their freedoms and rights. It's why we call socialism a "nanny state". It aims to "take care" of the people, infantilizing them and keeping them dependent on the government. It is socialism when it violates those freedoms in order to "take care" of them.
And of course - punishing them when they refuse to follow. I find it amusing that when protesters were observed to not be wearing masks or observing "social distancing" the media were aghast. What did you expect? THAT is what they're protesting. That would be like the Tea Party in Boston paying up their taxes BEFORE they got on the boats.
It's what parents do to their children while they are small - but our society is based on protecting freedoms, which means we do as we choose, within the law - a law WE AGREE on. We're self governing. That's the point. People in socialist societies - especially communism - will actually defend actions by the state that are awful - because "it's for the good of everyone".
Because they are NOT governing themselves. They've become serfs and they have benevolent masters. Or so they hope.