What a POS

bzbear2000

bzbear2000

Member
camily said:
I searched up the dude that got shot and killed. He's lucky he made it this long!
Adios loser! He had several boating/water related charges also. There was also indecent exposure (I'm sure that was lovely) along with two pages of charges.
http://www.somd.com/news/headlines/articles/4169.shtml


http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/inquiry/inquiry-index.jsp
Click to expand...

If you notice, there is a Senior and Junior. Junior was the one killed. Some of the charges were for the senior. Looks like you are the loser. :lmao:
 
bdh802

bdh802

Bob
camily said:
http://www.somd.com/news/headlines/articles/4177.shtml
And the story keeps getting better.
Click to expand...

This POS could be alive today if he just listened. He chose to die. Dumb sh*t! We lost a loser and there is no doubt in my mind the officer did the right thing but we all know what happens now. The liberal media and the hungry lawyers feed on this stuff. Long after this scumbag's body is decomposed, the officer will still be fighting to get his life back to normal. I guess if this idiot had beaten the officer to death, it would have been a small article in the back of the paper. Did I mention I can't stand the liberal media? Oh, and does anyone have any lawyer jokes?
 
camily

camily

Peace
bzbear2000 said:
If you notice, there is a Senior and Junior. Junior was the one killed. Some of the charges were for the senior. Looks like you are the loser. :lmao:
Click to expand...
Actually, only one specifically says "Sr." and his charge is a civil case classified as a "Contract" case. The other ones just have an "S" which stands for his middle name, "Samuel", buttmunch. Out of the 32 listed, 11 are simply Thomas S. Sherwood (might not be him, could be the father), one is Sr., three are two different individuals but most likely family members since their names are also Thomas Sherwood and are also from Talbot county. So that leaves 17 that are definitely him. I'll even throw in that he was the plantiff in a few. I still win. Looks like you're the loser. BTW, thanks for the funny gray karma.
 
hvp05

hvp05

Methodically disorganized
camily said:
I still win. Looks like you're the loser. BTW, thanks for the funny gray karma.
Click to expand...
:lmao: I know for a fact that he/she/it got a good dose of karma that was definitely not gray.
 
bzbear2000

bzbear2000

Member
camily said:
Actually, only one specifically says "Sr." and his charge is a civil case classified as a "Contract" case. The other ones just have an "S" which stands for his middle name, "Samuel", buttmunch. Out of the 32 listed, 11 are simply Thomas S. Sherwood (might not be him, could be the father), one is Sr., three are two different individuals but most likely family members since their names are also Thomas Sherwood and are also from Talbot county. So that leaves 17 that are definitely him. I'll even throw in that he was the plantiff in a few. I still win. Looks like you're the loser. BTW, thanks for the funny gray karma.
Click to expand...

What do you win? LOL. My point was it wasnt the junior with the indecent exposure charge. I corrected your slanderous statement and you sent some nasty private post. Maybe it is ok to make up stuff about people. We just call you Drama Queens. :drama: :lmao:
 
camily

camily

Peace
bzbear2000 said:
What do you win? LOL. My point was it wasnt the junior with the indecent exposure charge. I corrected your slanderous statement and you sent some nasty private post. Maybe it is ok to make up stuff about people. We just call you Drama Queens. :drama: :lmao:
Click to expand...
Ummm idiot. Yes it was, the birth date was 1956. You are an idiot.
http://casesearch.courts.state.md.u...s?caseId=00606360N6&loc=14&detailLoc=CRIMINAL

BTW, it's Thomas Sherwood and it is on the second page. The DOB is clear.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top