What we need is a little more understanding

[Hessian]

What are the odds? 100 gay students...brand new facility, special awareness classes, properly coached teachers, adapted curriculum
a team of lawyers ready to defend and...this is how they act:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35492

Hmmm, they are just misunderstood, poor darlings, we should try even harder to accomodate their "needs."

Public caning perhaps?

 

[Penn]

We do need to understand more....

Unfrickingbelievable!

Two more stories caught my eye this week, both from the Washington Times:

(1) On Weds, Nov 5th, front page news concerning a Denver, Colo. case: "Mother appeals ruling on Gays - Judge restricts views at home". The mother cannot use Christian scripture, or teachings to educate her adopted daughter why homosexuality is wrong, and goes against God's teachings.

Cheryl Clark, a Christian mother is appealing a judge's decision that she cannot teach her 8yr old daughter that homosexuality is wrong.

(2)Yesterday, Sat, Nov 8th, page 2, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire said if a married woman has sex with another woman, outside her ralationship with her husband, it is NOT considered adultery.

Apparently, the court decided since there was no sexual intercourse involved, the term adultery could not apply.

Nevermind that a hot, steamy rendezvous took place between two women who weren't supposed to be having ANY sort of sexual contact - oh well, New Hampshire sees a different set of rules apply for homosexuals than it does for heterosexuals.

Strange findings, indeed!

 

[Penn]

Here is a follow-up on the Cheryl Clark story in Denver
A judge is coming into a home of a mother of an adopted child, and telling her what material she can and cannot put in front of her child.

Are the courts with us, or against us?