Why is this necessary?

PsyOps

Pixelated
I just watched a news conference on FoxNews and they had Clay Moore (the 13 year old boy kidnapped in FL) and his family paraded in front of the cameras tomake statements and answer questions.

Can anyone please explain to me why it is suddenly important that these children, after suffering such a traumatic event, be paraded in front of flashing cameras and questioned by these media vultures? Was it not enough that they had to suffer at the hands of these sick monsters that they have to fulfill our insatiable appetite for tabloid information?
 

Charles

New Member
Is that the kid that his mother announced to everyone in the Nation that he was molested? That poor kid had two strikes against him before he left home.
 

hvp05

Methodically disorganized
PsyOps said:
Can anyone please explain to me why it is suddenly important that these children, after suffering such a traumatic event, be paraded in front of flashing cameras and questioned by these media vultures?
:lol: Remember, these (media heads) are the same people who believed our need to know ALL the details about the ANS case was so great that that story trump virtually every other headline, including delivering live coverage of the burial trial.

How much sensitivity do you expect? It's a business. :shrug:

And I think you inadvertently answered your own question...
PsyOps said:
I just watched...
 
Last edited:

hvp05

Methodically disorganized
PsyOps said:
Can anyone please explain to me why it is suddenly important that these children, after suffering such a traumatic event, be paraded in front of flashing cameras and questioned by these media vultures?
Oh, I'm curious: did you consider it any more acceptable when Oprah interviewed Shawn Hornbeck a mere 6 days after his returning home?
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
hvp05 said:
And I think you inadvertently answered your own question...
Actually, I had no choice. I was at my desk at work and couldn't change the channel. Watching was not in interest but in disgust that we have become so tabloid even with our most innocent; our children.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
hvp05 said:
Oh, I'm curious: did you consider it any more acceptable when Oprah interviewed Shawn Hornbeck a mere 6 days after his returning home?
I was equally disgusted with that. I think Oprah (despite all the good she does) is an opportunist in the end and is only interested in her ratings. But her wealth proves that it sells.
 

Pete

Repete
PsyOps said:
I just watched a news conference on FoxNews and they had Clay Moore (the 13 year old boy kidnapped in FL) and his family paraded in front of the cameras tomake statements and answer questions.

Can anyone please explain to me why it is suddenly important that these children, after suffering such a traumatic event, be paraded in front of flashing cameras and questioned by these media vultures? Was it not enough that they had to suffer at the hands of these sick monsters that they have to fulfill our insatiable appetite for tabloid information?
We have become a nation of busybodies. So many are totally wrapped up in the business of others they neglect themselves.
 

hvp05

Methodically disorganized
PsyOps said:
Actually, I had no choice. I was at my desk at work and couldn't change the channel. Watching was not in interest but in disgust that we have become so tabloid even with our most innocent; our children.
Media heads know not why you watch their channel, nor do they care. Ratings are straightforward; as long as they grab the numbers and the other guys don't the big guys are happy.

But if people would turn away en masse the ratings would decline... and then they would be compelled to take notice and change.

But don't hold your breath.
 
Top