That continues to not be Pelosi's purview to determine.There is a problem with one of the jurors. He announced publicly prior to the start of the trial he is not impartial.
So she is working to ensure that the trial is fair.
“I’m not an impartial juror. This is a political process,” he said. “I’m not impartial about this at all.”
Mitch McConnell Admits: ‘I’m Not An Impartial Juror,’ Calls Impeachment ‘Political Process’
Mitch McConnell is not being bashful about his feelings towards impeachment, openly telling reporters Tuesday that he is notdailycaller.com
So when did judicial jurisprudence come into play?There is a problem with one of the jurors. He announced publicly prior to the start of the trial he is not impartial.
So she is working to ensure that the trial is fair.
“I’m not an impartial juror. This is a political process,” he said. “I’m not impartial about this at all.”
Mitch McConnell Admits: ‘I’m Not An Impartial Juror,’ Calls Impeachment ‘Political Process’
Mitch McConnell is not being bashful about his feelings towards impeachment, openly telling reporters Tuesday that he is notdailycaller.com
Define what you think she would consider "fair".So she is working to ensure that the trial is fair.
They are feverishly trying to figure out how they can go to court to force the Senate to hold the trial according to their liking. You know, only call the witnesses they want to get called, NOT call the witnesses the other side wants to hear from. Basic cangaroo court kind of stuff.
The quicker this is over, the better. Mitch shouldn't even give them the satisfaction of a drawn out trial. House manager gets an hour to present his case, Trump lawyer moves for summary judgement, senate holds a vote, impeachment is over.
There is a problem with one of the jurors.
Let me stop you right there. For the past couple of weeks our democrat luminaries have been telling us that :
Etc.
- impeachment is not a judicial process,
- that no violation of law has to occur for something to be impeachable
- that the executive was to answer the houses subpoenas without the courts having a say in the matter.
So it is entirely disingenuous to now demand that the senators act as 'impartial jurors'. They are not jurors, they are politicians elected in a partisan election process. The impeachment is a political process. If you have control of the legislature, you can remove a president you don't like. The house democrats certainly acted as political hacks, can't be too suprised if the republican senators link their position on the impeachment to their politics.
Had the house impeached Trump based on an actual violation of law (on or about 7/25/2019 Donald J Trump violated xx USC yyyy by doing thisandtheother), there would be a case to call for an impartial jury to decide whether that was in fact the case. But they didn't do that.
There is a problem with one of the jurors.
She is going to stall until the 2020 elections in hopes that if Trump wins they can gain seats in the Senate and then send it hoping they can remove him. Of course the flaw in that logic is that he will have won re-election and then her garbage is truly a coup.Because she knows she poohed the scrooch and the Senate is getting ready to hammer home their foolishness. She's buying time until somebody can figure out what to do.
There is a problem with one of the jurors. He announced publicly prior to the start of the trial he is not impartial.
So she is working to ensure that the trial is fair.
“I’m not an impartial juror. This is a political process,” he said. “I’m not impartial about this at all.”
Mitch McConnell Admits: ‘I’m Not An Impartial Juror,’ Calls Impeachment ‘Political Process’
Mitch McConnell is not being bashful about his feelings towards impeachment, openly telling reporters Tuesday that he is notdailycaller.com