Zimmerman = Classy.... Not!

Hank

Hank

my war
George Zimmerman has sparked fury on Twitter yet again after retweeting a picture of Trayvon Martin’s dead body.

A fan had posted the shocking image on the social network alongside a message to Zimmerman saying: ‘Z-Man is a one man army.’

Zimmerman then retweeted the image to more than 10,000 followers on his account, which he often uses to troll people online.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...von-Martin-s-lifeless-body.html#ixzz3n3be6h00
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
Gilligan

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
I don't recall ever thinking "Gee, that George Zimmerman feller sure is one smart, savvy individual". Ever.
 
vraiblonde

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Gilligan said:
I don't recall ever thinking "Gee, that George Zimmerman feller sure is one smart, savvy individual". Ever.
Click to expand...

I don't even recall hearing/seeing anyone else express that sentiment. Curious why he would retweet something like that. Idiot.
 
This_person

This_person

Well-Known Member
BigBlue said:
George Zimmerman has that right ,apparently .
Click to expand...
First, again, I make a lot of editorial mistakes myself, so I am not a fanatic about it, but would you PLEASE learn how to punctuate properly? Commas, for example, do not normally have a space before them. Nor do periods. Your horrific use of the printed English language is exceptionally distracting.

Second, it would seem from the evidence that it was Mr. Martin who felt he had the right to make that determination and that Mr. Zimmerman protected himself from just such an act of aggression from Mr. Martin. While I would agree it would have been better if Mr. Zimmerman had simply allowed the suspicious character go unchecked after calling it in, it would have been even better than that if Mr. Martin had not engaged and subsequently attacked (physically) Mr. Zimmerman.

It would seem some think Mr. Martin had the right to stand his ground, but Mr. Zimmerman did not. I believe they both have the right to do so, and both would have been better off to not exercise that right. But, in the end, the evidence showed Mr. Martin to be the physical aggressor, and that is simply intolerable.

So, your belief of who felt they had that right that night seems to be factually inaccurate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top