gemma_rae
Well-Known Member
Is that supposed to be a defense of Trump?
Is that supposed to be a defense of you being worthless?
Is that supposed to be a defense of Trump?
Have you not been paying attention?
He is good at manipulating the media and messaging. Doesnt translate to him being able to run country for SH**
It's rumored President Trump has started taking Xanax.
To stop hispanic attacks
Maybe you and transporter can clear this up....
How is it that Trump can, at the same time, be the most uneducated, idiotic, unfit, and unreliable President of all time BUT... at the same time, he is genius enough to "manipulate his base" by enacting a genius plan to "distract attention so he can ruin this country for profit?"
Essentially.. according to you and transporter, he is an idiot and a manipulative genius at the same time? :shrug:
So here is the basic and most simplistic answer...Trump's base is less educated and more easily manipulated than Trump is.
And, yet, you can't win a simple point 99% of the time with any of them, because you're even more wrongererer than them.
Wow...you really just posted that?
So here is the basic and most simplistic answer...Trump's base is less educated and more easily manipulated than Trump is.
Trump is inept at being President...he's spent his entire life pulling the wool over the eyes of his "base".
God damn MG...that was a really stupid post. Thanks for proving the point.
You do realize Trump could have gotten the funding for his wall anytime in the previous two years when republicans controlled both the House and Senate don't you?
You do realize this is political theater designed to distract from the fact that he is a con man and will soon be exposed. He is merely trying to whip his racist uneducated base into a frenzy so they will be too distracted to pay attention to the way he is ruining this country for profit.
When was it that Republicans had a cloture-proof control of the Senate?
Is it not true that the likelihood of passing border wall funding was higher at any point in the last two years then when Trump decided to do it as the house returned to Democratic control?
That tells you all you need to know about what is actually driving this idiotic shutdown
So, your statement that he could have was, actually factually inaccurate. You get that, right?
It might have been higher - (indeed, since Schumer WANTED to fund it repeatedly in the past (before Trump wanted to do it), it would seem it would have been even easier when Obama (who voted for the Secure Fence Act as a senator) had control - cloture-proof - of both Houses of Congress and himself) - but, still, that he simply could have done it without Democrat support in the Senate was just a bald-faced lie. It was only sheer incompetence that didn't allow it to happen during Obama, and purely hate for Trump that does not allow it to happen now.
You get your lie, right? You're admitting it?
It is absolutely true Trump could have gotten the funding for his wall at any point in the last two years with a tiny bit of effort.
It is absolutely true Trump could have gotten the funding for his wall at any point in the last two years with a tiny bit of effort.
You do realize Trump could have gotten the funding for his wall anytime in the previous two years when republicans controlled both the House and Senate don't you?
It is politically advantageous for him to do it now instead. because
A. even most republicans know its a stupid idea and a waste of money and will put us in enormous debt and won't solve anything. The majority of guns and drugs are snuck through legal checkpoints. Most terrorists have come through airports and illegal immigrants will always find a way in if they are determined.
b. It is a good way to keep his moronic base energized and supportive of him despite the fact that he is inept and has screwed up everything he has touched.
So here is the basic and most simplistic answer...
Jesus you really have a hard time focusing don't you?
That may or may not be true. For one, it would have required Chuckles Schumer to have been willing to work with him to do what "Leader" Schumer actually wanted done (before Trump wanted it done).
But, that's not what you said originally. What you said originally was:
Republicans did not control the Senate in a cloture-proof way, so your entire statement became factually inaccurate. It was predicated on the idea that Trump did not need Democrat support, and that is simply factually inaccurate (a lie).
You lied. Just admit it. You may have MEANT that "maybe he could have if...", but it's not what you said originally. You lied originally. Just admit it. You lied, because you don't understand how things work.
Just admit you lied.
WRT A: You believe it is a waste of money because....why? Everything you said after that implies it would be harder to get in, so bad people would have to find a different way (if they are determined to do so). We know THOUSANDS of people in the last "caravan" turned around for the very reason you said - they weren't determined enough to get in if it wasn't easier. So, you trolled yourself into proving it's actually a GOOD idea.
You're concerned about $5B in debt (as you should be), but the costs of illegal immigrants in the US are upwards of 50-70 times more than the cost of a border barrier - voted "yes" on by Obama and Schumer and Clinton and... - which you just demonstrated would limit the illegal immigration. When we currently have a debt of over $20T (that's 4,000 times more than $5B), an investment of $5B seems rather worth it.
WRT B: Since this was a good idea for a long time, and yet not done, did you feel it was a way to keep Schumer's or Obama's or Bill Clinton's moronic base energized, since they said the EXACT SAME things Trump is saying?
Stop pretending you are stupid.