JPC sr said:
I see you are determined to attack me personally and that is what child support does too, and there is no way to satisfy your or its attacks because it is all fixed into your unjust perspective, and that too is a big reason why it simply must be fought, and fought with all due effort.
Actually, I have no intention to attack you personally, you don't mean that much to me. But, you're going off saying how there are no parents that don't take care of their kids, and that parents will take care of their kids without a system to protect the kids, etc, etc. So, I offer you up a case you know a good bit about, YOU. I'm trying to let you see that there are parents that won't support their own children, YOU didn't. I'm trying to show you there are parents who will go to great lengths including leaving the state, not working, going to jail, etc, to get out of providing for their own child - YOU did all of these things. You can't say there aren't parents out there who would do this - YOU did it. What I don't understand is how you feel that it's an attack when I simply state your actions, actions you say you feel proud of.....
But for me to try to answer into your slander and lies is not due effort.
If they were lies (no need to be redundant and say both words) there would be no effort. You have been cornered into the truth after I don't know how many hundreds of posts between this and other threads, and you are now forced to see your actions in the sunlight. You can't handle what you've done (even though you say you're proud of it, that parents abandoning their own children like you have are HEROs) so you say I twist your words. I post the links to the quotes and your exact words, but I'm twisting them. No, your words are twisted, and you're being forced to face it. You're in the first stage of your moral shell shock - denial.
My case is closed and if you or the law thinks I am guilty of anything then send the police to come and get me, but otherwise you can go to the ...... and your ugly opinions can go with you and I will help send that thieving child support down the serwer where it belongs whether anyone approves or not.
Yep, and OJ will find the real killer, and Rosie will out the president for his war crimes, and Clinton did not have sexual relations with that woman...... Grow up. Your case is closed, but your crimes against your son, his mother, his stepfather, and society are not forgiven nor forgotten. You take no personal responsibility (look in the dictionary, not the Cusick twisted words book for how I'm using the word responsibility) for your actions. When you do, you may begin to sleep better at night, and you may begin to help your son.
My efforts are not to deal with my own past case as that is history, and now I am only trying to help other parents and other families that are still being mistreated by the unjust child support system - and I will stand against the dirty slander too.
You can't explain how the system is unjust, or immoral, or theft, or any of the other slanders you've used against it, though. See, I understand you're not trying to get out of your own case, your son's real man of a stepfather did that for you long ago - he took on your responsibilities as a dad, and as a provider and protector for your son, then protected you (probably for the sake of your son) from being held accountable. I'm trying to help you see, via your case, that your ideas are wrong, that the system has room for improvement, but that your thoughts would be a degradation, not improvement of the system. Use you as an example for all the things you're saying should help child support, and you prove those things wouldn't help kids nor families - they'd hurt. Child support doesn't break families up, mothers and fathers do. Child support doesn't put people in jail, non-supporting parents do after years of trying everything else including employment assistance. You prove all of this. You are the example of why your ways wouldn't work. Face it.
I think that post of yours is just so telling us like you are. 
Yea, lynch mob rule is what democracy has.
