glhs837
Power with Control
How about more personal responsibility :shrug:, don't drink and drive, text while driving etc.
One way you encourage people to take responsibility is to punish them when they fail to do so.
How about more personal responsibility :shrug:, don't drink and drive, text while driving etc.
How about more personal responsibility :shrug:, don't drink and drive, text while driving etc.
Not blamed, this is not their fault. The point is that if we took some of the hours that are spent running speed enforcement on Saturday and Sunday mornings on Rt 235, and instead dedicated those hours to enforcing things that contribute more to crashes, then deterrence might have an effect. Officers perform the enforcement they are told to perform. And since one of the metrics is numbers of citations given, those activities that generate citations get precedence. Another factor is that speed enforcement gets the officers heads into a lot of cars. And the more cars they stick their heads into, the more chances of catching a real bad guy.
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
Why don't we just skip the bill of rights and go to warrantless stops, searches and interrogations.
It's for our safety isn't it?
Or as one paraphrase puts it, "People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both."
So what's a little domestic spying, sham traffic stops, sobriety checkpoint anyone.
Why don't we just skip the bill of rights and go to warrantless stops, searches and interrogations.
It's for our safety isn't it?
No searches. You broke the law, that gives them the right to stop you and talk to you. Nothing wrong with that. But I do take exception that it's for traffic safety. It's not.