The story said she was 16 :shrug:
As of recently, I KNOW that 16 was the age of consent (but there could only be like a 4 year difference between the people or something). Now I have heard word that MD may have even altered this law and made it 17 or 18....That would make this statutory rape in any case. I really just don't feel that if the girl is 16 and gives consent that it should be classified as "child sex abuse". She knew damn well what she was getting into, he effed up and messed around with someone too young...but lets not put him up there with the sick mofos that molest kids who are not even pubecent (sp?) yet. Two totally different things IMO.