mAlice
professional daydreamer
You're probably right. I'd be pretty freakin' terrified if I were her.
Lisa Page
- Thread starter mAlice
- Start date
You're probably right. I'd be pretty freakin' terrified if I were her.
Grumpy
Well-Known Member
It was simply role playing by those 2..He was Lance Link and she was Mata Hari.
Or, after seeing all those middle school texts released publicly, she had a come-to-jeebus moment and realized how effed up and wrong it all was.
gemma_rae
Well-Known Member
Ignore the Heroes!
mAlice
professional daydreamer
Mueller's workin' on that, sweety. winkwink
Better question:
Why won't Republicans open an investigation as to why our CIA and FBI allowed a Russian spy to ascend to the presidency?
But why do you suppose the Republicans would cover for them and not demand an investigation?
Or is it the same reason they don't want to know about Hillary's email server?
Yep. They all protect each other.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
I don't know who suggested Sessions for Attorney General to Donald Trump, but that guy is not working for America.
Yep. They all protect each other.
It all comes down to Trump upset the apple cart.
You have a normal business person, not a member of the ruling class, in the most prestigious office in the nation.
They are outraged and have been since the moment of the election result.
Think about that. The Democrats and Never Trumpers have been vying for his impeachment before he even took the oath. Almost back to election day.
NO They Wont .....
Lisa Page Gave Significantly Different Testimony Than Peter Stzrok, Congressman Says
Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) told Fox News' Maria Bartiromo that there were "significant differences" in Page's testimony compared to the testimony given by Strzok and that she gave congressional investigators new information they did not previously have.
"In many cases, she admits that the text messages mean exactly what they say, as opposed to Agent Strzok, who thinks that we've all misinterpreted his own words on any text message that might be negative," Ratcliff told reporters on Monday, according to ABC News.
Rep. Steve King (R-IA) agreed with Ratcliffe's statement, saying, "She's certainly more cooperative than Peter Strzok was and the pieces of information filled in some blanks along the way, but we've got a huge jigsaw puzzle to put together."
Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) told Fox News' "FOX & Friends" that Page gave Congress "more insights to who was involved in what."
"She's a more contrite person," Gohmert said. "But make no mistake, she's a Democrat, she wanted Hillary to win and she did not want Trump to win, and that's been obvious."
Gohmert then took a shot at former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, saying, "When I hear Brennan or Clapper either saying the kind of things they've been saying recently, then it tells me, wow, we must be getting close to them. Those guilty dogs are barking pretty loud."
GregV814
Well-Known Member
What sealed it for me during the primaries was when Mitt came out and gave his opinion of Trump. Here's a guy with no skin in the game telling everyone that electing Trump would be the worst thing for America. I would have loved to hear the committee when they talked to Mitt about saving their kingdom from an outsider. How'd that work out for you there Mittens? Once elected, Trump took the high road and had a sit down with the presidential election loser.
I have to admit that I'm surprised to her the reports about what Page could be saying. I was certain she was postponing her interview until after Strzok's so she could get her story straight with his.
Don’t count on anything just yet.