Mueller enpannels grand jury

[Midnightrider]

Again... since you (who isn't doing the investigation) have made up your mind about it, and Mueller - THE GUY WHO IS DOING THE INVESTIGATION - hasn't, perhaps you need to inform Mueller that he's lagging behind in his duties.

Again, you don't know what he has made his mind up about. A mueller was charged with investigating and prosecuting any crimes related to the investigation that was ongoing or any crimes uncovered in his investigation. As I have explained to you before, mueller isn't lagging at anything. Federal investigations take time.

 

[hotbikermama40]

Again, you don't know what he has made his mind up about. A mueller was charged with investigating and prosecuting any crimes related to the investigation that was ongoing or any crimes uncovered in his investigation. As I have explained to you before, mueller isn't lagging at anything. Federal investigations take time.

But with Trump having 100% control over Mueller, there's bound to be roadblocks tying things up, eh?

 

[Hijinx]

Mueller will drag this thing on for months.

Why all the lawyers. One man could have questioned everyone involved in a week at most.

 

[PsyOps]

Again, you don't know what he has made his mind up about. A mueller was charged with investigating and prosecuting any crimes related to the investigation that was ongoing or any crimes uncovered in his investigation. As I have explained to you before, mueller isn't lagging at anything. Federal investigations take time.

BINGO! You're right. I don't know. And I'm not going to speculate based on my bias. And either do you; yet you've made up your mind about it. You keep going back to investigations take time and Mueller hasn't finished his investigation yet. That has nothing to do with your admitted belief that Trump's lie is EVIDENCE of collusion. What are the facts you have to prove this? I haven't seen anything from this investigation to support this. Please provide your evidence.

You've admitted that there are several reason why a person would lie; but it's to cover up wrongdoing. Out of all the reasons Jr could have lied, you whittled it down to one thing - collusion. What are the facts that led you to believe this?

FINE! Let Mueller do his job. How about you stop coming to unfounded conclusions? I cannot imagine if Mueller did what you're doing assuming things without evidence simply because you don't like the guy. You're not interested in fairly applied justice. You're not interested any honest outcome. You WANT it to be collusion because it fits your hatred for this man. And when the final outcome can't conclude anything illegal - especially collusion - you'll jump on the next bandwagon 'scandal' democrats dredge up. It's foolish at your level. It's dangerous at the level of the likes of Maxine Waters and her ilk who are insanely bent on making sure this president is impeached.

 

[Midnightrider]

BINGO! You're right. I don't know. And I'm not going to speculate based on my bias. And either do you; yet you've made up your mind about it. You keep going back to investigations take time and Mueller hasn't finished his investigation yet. That has nothing to do with your admitted belief that Trump's lie is EVIDENCE of collusion. What are the facts you have to prove this? I haven't seen anything from this investigation to support this. Please provide your evidence.

You've admitted that there are several reason why a person would lie; but it's to cover up wrongdoing. Out of all the reasons Jr could have lied, you whittled it down to one thing - collusion. What are the facts that led you to believe this?

FINE! Let Mueller do his job. How about you stop coming to unfounded conclusions? I cannot imagine if Mueller did what you're doing assuming things without evidence simply because you don't like the guy. You're not interested in fairly applied justice. You're not interested any honest outcome. You WANT it to be collusion because it fits your hatred for this man. And when the final outcome can't conclude anything illegal - especially collusion - you'll jump on the next bandwagon 'scandal' democrats dredge up. It's foolish at your level. It's dangerous at the level of the likes of Maxine Waters and her ilk who are insanely bent on making sure this president is impeached.

I'm not assuming anything. The evidence is right there in JRs email and the FACT that they lied about the meeting. That meets the definition of collusion, and that is just what they have admitted to or lies that they have been caught it that are known to the public. It could be a lot worse, or that could be all of it.

In any case, as I said numerous times now collusion is not necessarily illegal. That's what mueller is looking into. It's really pretty straight forward.

As for the rest of your post, let's just say you are projecting.

 

[Gilligan]

I'm not assuming anything. The evidence is right there in JRs email and the FACT that they lied about the meeting. That meets the definition of collusion, .

It does? What Federal statute us that under?

Collusion is not a federal crime (except in the unique case of antitrust law), so we should all just stop using “collusion” as a short-hand for criminality.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/07/12/what-is-collusion-215366

 

[Midnightrider]

It does? What Federal statute us that under?




http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/07/12/what-is-collusion-215366

You need to learn to read the entire post before you respond Mo.

In any case, as I said numerous times now collusion is not necessarily illegal. That's what mueller is looking into. It's really pretty straight forward

.

 

[This_person]

In any case, as I said numerous times now collusion is not necessarily illegal. That's what mueller is looking into. It's really pretty straight forward.

Still looking for the "so what?"

 

[Gilligan]

You need to learn to read the entire post before you respond Mo.


.

So you don't have a rational response. Typical.

 

[Wishbone]

Wow. The delusion, desperation and blame shifting is very strong with this one.

So Ironic.

And you seem to do it so effortlessly.

Keep up the good work!

 

[PsyOps]

I'm not assuming anything. The evidence is right there in JRs email and the FACT that they lied about the meeting. That meets the definition of collusion

Show it to me.

 

[Midnightrider]

Show it to me.

google Jrs email, then google the definition of collusion, then google DJs story about the meeting.

Or you can go back through this thread where all of that information has been provided

 

[This_person]

google Jrs email, then google the definition of collusion, then google DJs story about the meeting.

Or you can go back through this thread where all of that information has been provided

Ok, so hypothetically it meets the meaningless definition of collusion.

Now what?

What is the "so what" about that? Is it illegal (no)? Is it immoral (no)? Is it uncommon in a campaign (no)? Is it even uncommon in the campaign where proof has been shown of collusion between the media, DNC, and Clinton campaign staff (no)?

So, so what?

 

[This_person]

Ok, so hypothetically it meets the meaningless definition of collusion.

Now what?

What is the "so what" about that? Is it illegal (no)? Is it immoral (no)? Is it uncommon in a campaign (no)? Is it even uncommon in the campaign where proof has been shown of collusion between the media, DNC, and Clinton campaign staff (no)?

So, so what?

MR? Can't come up with something?