RNS Wire Service Taking Funding From Atheist

E

EmptyTimCup

Guest
Prominent ‘Religion News Service’ Wire Service Found to Be Taking Funding From Atheist Mogul in Exchange for Coverage of ‘Freethinkers’ — Ethical?



  • Religion News Service (RNS) has received $65,000 in funds (2011-2012) from the Stiefel Freethought Foundation, an atheist group
  • Funding was granted to bolster RNS’s “coverage of freethinkers”
  • Millionaire Todd Stiefel claims he has no editorial control over RNS coverage
  • RNS’s editor-in-chief Kevin Eckstrom defends the gifts and says the outlet is seeking funding from other faith-based foundations as well
  • Poynter’s Kelly McBride weighs in on the ethics surrounding the funding

Religion News Service (RNS), a prominent non-profit news organization focused on faith, is facing some of the same financial constraints that have led to the demise of numerous traditional media outlets. As time goes on and revenue becomes tougher to generate, newsrooms like RNS find themselves looking for ways to bring in much-needed funds. One of the more controversial models that the group has embraced is accepting funds from special interest groups.


RELIGION NEWS SERVICE TAKING FUNDING FROM ATHEISTS

In the case of RNS, The Stiefel Freethought Foundation (SFF), a hub for the atheist movement, has given $65,000 over the past two years to help fund coverage of non-believers and the so-called “freethought” movement. The organization, run by atheist millionaire Todd Stiefel (read our extensive profile about him here), has a very clear goal of organizing atheists, while spreading and advancing non-belief.

An announcement on the SFF web site explains the purpose of an initial $50,000 gift in 2011. Under a section entitled “Accomplishments in 2011,” the site reads, “SFF donated $50,000 to Religion News Service to bolster its coverage of freethinkers with a series of news, investigations, feature stories and photos.”
 

StoneThrower

New Member
RELIGION NEWS SERVICE TAKING FUNDING FROM ATHEISTS
.”

I think the author of this article is clueless. He's complaining that a religious news service may be unethical taking funding from a religious organization. Atheism is a religion.
Next this quote:
"Most mainstream and hard news-driven media outlets adhere to journalistic standards that, on the surface, would make this union suspect. While there are certainly biases to be accounted for, the overall notion is that general news outlets, at least in theory, are supposed to remain non-partisan and unaligned with slanted perspective and special interests."

Is he kidding me, this has to be the best joke of the year. Even so were not dealing with mainstream. If this was a Christian news network it would be a conflict of interest but as it is, all this amounts to is free press for the Atheist organization.
 

StoneThrower

New Member
A person's religion is the sum total of his belief

Atheism is not a religion.

How so?
They try to convert people, and the fight against a God they dont believe in.
If God doesnt exsist than why fight it, evangelise agaisnt Him, why care what anyone else thinks as it wouldnt matter?

The seven dimensions proposed by Smart are narrative, experiential, social, ethical, doctrinal, ritual and material.

Contemporary Western Atheism unquestionably has six of the seven dimensions of religion set forth by Smart, and the remaining dimension, ritual, has also started to develop.
 

wxtornado

The Other White Meat
There are atheistic religions, like Buddhism or Raelism, but atheism itself doesn't constitute a religion.
 
Top