I am not at all surprised that Democrats come to his defense.
I really wish he wasn't leaving.
You have to wonder about this Strzok person, what kind of an arrogant ass he is to be sassing a United States Congressman during a hearing where he is being questioned about his unethical and perhaps illegal behavior.
The other is, that his bias was known - but it apparently was never brought up either when he was brought on to the investigation - or when he was dismissed.
There was a curious paradox going on with this. While they (some) defended Strzok in receiving the ire from republicans, some also blamed Strzok, Comey and the FBI for causing Hillary's loss.
I was at work, so I didn't watch the whole thing . I only saw snippets last night. Do we know if the ones who were clutching their pearls the most and speaking sternly in their faux outrage are the ones who are not up for re-election?
Two things surprise me - one is - the revelation of any kind of personal bias would - were this voir dire in a courtroom - result in immediate rejection from a jury.
That sort of thing if it came up would totally convince any attorney that the potential juror is far too biased to make an objective decision.
The other is, that his bias was known - but it apparently was never brought up either when he was brought on to the investigation - or when he was dismissed.
I've seen this mentioned a few other places, and I find it to be spot-on accurate. I wonder if he was asked about this or if he would be asked this on camera at some point.
Did anyone catch the "you need your medication" when Gohmert was questioning Strzok?
Really, the whole thing was an embarrassing circus from all sides.
It was the House - 100% are up for re-election. Historically, I think it is in the 90% range for those who seek re-election to be re-elected, thanks to gerrymandering and the political parties controlling who runs where.
Well Gohmert asked what lie he told his wife when he was screwing Page.
That brought out screams, but it did show the guy is a liar.
I was at work, so I didn't watch the whole thing . I only saw snippets last night. Do we know if the ones who were clutching their pearls the most and speaking sternly in their faux outrage are the ones who are not up for re-election?
Well Gohmert asked what lie he told his wife when he was screwing Page.
That brought out screams, but it did show the guy is a liar.
I heard that. I thought that was pretty out of line. Stick with the facts that you know. Don't start getting personal at that level. I think Gohmert kind of regrets that part of this questioning. And he should.
I heard that. I thought that was pretty out of line. Stick with the facts that you know. Don't start getting personal at that level. I think Gohmert kind of regrets that part of this questioning. And he should.
Perhaps over the top, but it did serve to establish Strzok as a skilled liar.
You gotta' see this gif. This guy has an over the top creep factor.
https://www.chicksonright.com/blog/...e-stuff-of-nightmares-but-its-also-hilarious/