The flip side of the Gillette commercial

Yooper

Up. Identified. Lase. Fire. On the way.
Great post. T/Y.

Agreed. Why I keep hawking Robert Cialdini's and Scott Adams' books on persuading/persuasion; so that people can understand that's what's going on.

And why, btw, Liberals generally control the narrative (in comparison to Conservatives): Libs know to focus on the emotional b/c they KNOW it disengages rational analysis. Why we always hear Libs making the "But the children" appeal (it's in so many of their assaults: gun control, climate change, DACA & illegal immigration,and - perversely - abortion).

--- End of line (MCP)
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
While the brand is admitting that it's reversing course on the social issues messaging, Gillette is presenting its new focus as simply a return to what it's always done. "We will continue to represent men at their best," Gillette said in a statement reported by News Corp Australia. Instead of the "social issues" focus, the brand will begin to highlight positive portrayals of "heroic" masculinity, as seen in its new ad starring Ben Ziekenheiner, an Australian firefighter and personal trainer.

[clip]

The backlash to the scolding and sexist ad was swift and strong, with many Gillette users taking to social media to announce they were done with the brand. For the next few months, Gillette responded by doubling down on the social justice messaging, releasing a "fat acceptance" ad as well as an ad showing a father's first time teaching his female-to-male transgender child how to shave.

But as The Daily Wire reported, seven months after rolling out its "toxic" campaign, Gillette's parent company Procter & Gamble found itself taking an $8 billion writedown for the brand. Despite positive performance overall for Procter & Gamble Co., who enjoyed better than expected profits last quarter, the company ended up reporting a net loss of over $5 billion. The reason: Gillette's nosedive.

"Procter & Gamble Co’s (PG.N) quarterly revenue and adjusted profit beat Wall Street expectations on Tuesday, sending shares to a record-high even as the world’s No.1 personal goods company took an $8 billion charge on its Gillette shaving business," Reuters reported in late July. Procter & Gamble "reported a net loss of about $5.24 billion, or $2.12 per share, for the quarter ended June 30, due to an $8 billion non-cash writedown of Gillette," the news agency explained.



https://www.dailywire.com/news/5091...potlight-after-losing-8-billion-james-barrett
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Can we all agree that we're sick of politics taking over everything? Honestly, what guy is going to buy a razor that's marketed toward transgenders? Sephora has been using the ugliest trans male models you've ever seen - some gnarly guy with a 5 o'clock shadow and hideous red lipstick smeared on his mug. How is this going to make women want to buy their products? Grossly obese women modeling bikinis - who wants to see that?

Enough already. Yeesh.
 

Monello

Smarter than the average bear
PREMO Member
140216
 
Top