God is almighty. we just have to pray god doesn't get angry and send a flood or hurricane or fire to destroy us and we will be fine. Conversely, its gods will what can we do?
What does this have to do with the question I asked? If the climate is changing, and your contention through this response is that you believe Christians simply believe the climate changes because God says so, then why would we deny it? You said denying man-made climate change is a religious requirement of Christians - where is that written?
So you think the government should not register anyones relationships?
At this point in time, absolutely yes. However, I'm answering what you MEAN to say, which is whether or not people should register with the government. The government does not register your relationship, you do, voluntarily, with the government. However, the reasons for the perks and disadvantages are no longer nearly as valid as they used to be, and therefore I see no reason the government should provide those perks and disadvantages anymore.
How about doing away with drivers license too while we are at it?
You make a mistake others make when thinking about marriage certificates - they're permission to be together (in your mind, apparently).
A marriage license/certificate does nothing for you except register with the government your relationship. It does not provide permission, there are no government tests you must pass, no skills training you must take, etc. It's simply requesting the government-related advantages and disadvantages.
A driver's license is provided when one passes tests to prove knowledge and skill to drive a car. It suggests that you won't damage other people, because you've successfully proven you know the laws/rules of driving as well as demonstrated you could do so in the presence of an evaluator.
Do you see the difference? Do you get that a driver's license and marriage certificate are apples and bricks, no comparison at all?
What about in cases of rape and incest?
Well, now see, this is where I can show you even more that I do not believe laws and religion should be intertwined. From a religious point of view, I would still call those things murder. However, from a secular point of view, if a woman is raped she is not responsible for the life created from the crime. If she has filed a rape report and a judge believes there is sufficient evidence to believe a rape has been committed, I fully agree with that being legal. If the incest is non-consensual (including statutorily), that's rape. If the incest is between two consenting adults, that's not rape, so I can't see why it would be okay to kill the baby.
However, we're talking about literally decimal-point dust in the overall scheme of how many abortions take place annually. According to Planned Parenthood, rape and incest make up less than 1% of all abortions.
So why do we have these so called religious freedom laws ?
To allow the first amendment to exist. The first amendment, with respect to religion, reads: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. However, many areas have made it very difficult to freely exercise their religion. For example, if one finds themselves a Muslim baker, and a same-sex couple asks to have their wedding cake made, the baker should certainly be allowed to say, "NO" because they do not want to support something for which their religion tells them not to support. A group of nuns should probably not have to pay for maternity insurance (or any insurance just for existing, but I digress) since them being sexually active is counter to their religious beliefs. Many laws have been passed, or regulations enacted, that restrict these free expressions of religion.