Yea, except for the fact that Trump wasn't wiretapped. Even funnier, he thinks Obama did it. LOL.
Sure would be nice if GURPS could read the entire story and certainly would be nice if Vrai could read English at all. This is from the same damn story GURPS posted:
Funny how GURPS asks Chris for something other than snark...then when chris points out the (typical) stupidity of GURPS' post, his reply is nothing but snark!
You said you didn't vote, and then after I busted your balls all day on election day you changed your tune to the LIE you are telling now, that you voted, just not on the national ballot. It is a pretty retarded claim to make particularly when you said yourself you didn't vote
You are retarded.
So you don't want the link to where YOu SAID YOU WERE NOT VOTING after all....that's what I thought.so once and for all - were you in the polling place one election day, in the voting booth, ad the voting terminal with me :shrug:
no I did not think so ......
so you don't know what I did or whom I voted for, so Go Fly a Kite
Although the beltway elite and their Chia pets in the media will split hairs about whether or not it was Obama who explicitly ordered the surveillance, it is beginning to be clear that there was an effort to surveil candidate and then President Trump — and many parties lied about it.
So you don't want the link to where YOU SAID YOU WERE NOT VOTING after all....that's what I thought.
its ONLINE I can say any damn thing I want ....
YOU just need to keep that #### straight because I don't forget, and I will bust you on it.
.... were you there ?
And there you have it, you think you can say anything online, regardless of the truth.that makes you an admitted liar.
Like I said, you can lie if you want, but I am going to remember it and bust your stupid ass over it.
Yea, except for the fact that Trump wasn't wiretapped. Even funnier, he thinks Obama did it. LOL.
Does anyone but me remember that the FBI raided his home back in July and confiscated some documents that were supposedly going to prove that he was a Russian spy or some such? And notice that we haven't heard anything about it since, although the NYT "reported" that the FBI was going to bring charges of espionage against him? Did they plan on doing that any time soon? Or is this just another one of those things the Dems and their media cohorts do, make serious accusations without any evidence, get it cemented in prog "brains", then forget about it because it's nothing?
Stop it, you silly person. The Democrats - led by Barack Obama, in case you've forgotten - were doing "opposition research", which involved digital surveillance and wire tapping. We all knew it was true before Trump even said it. To feign innocence and ignorance is laughable.
If the FBI surveilled Manafort, they certainly did Trump as well. And even if they didn't directly go after Trump, it's playing silly word games to say, "Oh, well, they didn't wire tap Trump, just the people who were talking to him." That may work to appease the progbot walking dead true believers, but it will not work on anyone rational.
Barack Obama may not have directly ordered the wire tapping, but he certainly knew about it and approved it. Plausible deniability only works with those who so desperately want to believe. Sane people know who gave the go-ahead on that.
Speaking of Manafort, though:
Does anyone but me remember that the FBI raided his home back in July and confiscated some documents that were supposedly going to prove that he was a Russian spy or some such? And notice that we haven't heard anything about it since, although the NYT "reported" that the FBI was going to bring charges of espionage against him? Did they plan on doing that any time soon? Or is this just another one of those things the Dems and their media cohorts do, make serious accusations without any evidence, get it cemented in prog "brains", then forget about it because it's nothing?
Samantha Power was unmasking United States citizens at an astonishing rate in the final months of the Obama administration, Fox News reported Wednesday evening.
The former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations unmasked at such a rapid pace that she ended up "averaging more than one request for every working day in 2016," multiple sources said to Fox. And she continued to seek identifying information about Americans caught up in incidental surveillance right up to President Trump’s inauguration:
Stop it, you silly person. The Democrats - led by Barack Obama, in case you've forgotten - were doing "opposition research", which involved digital surveillance and wire tapping. We all knew it was true before Trump even said it. To feign innocence and ignorance is laughable.
If the FBI surveilled Manafort, they certainly did Trump as well. And even if they didn't directly go after Trump, it's playing silly word games to say, "Oh, well, they didn't wire tap Trump, just the people who were talking to him." That may work to appease the progbot walking dead true believers, but it will not work on anyone rational.
Barack Obama may not have directly ordered the wire tapping, but he certainly knew about it and approved it. Plausible deniability only works with those who so desperately want to believe. Sane people know who gave the go-ahead on that.
Speaking of Manafort, though:
Does anyone but me remember that the FBI raided his home back in July and confiscated some documents that were supposedly going to prove that he was a Russian spy or some such? And notice that we haven't heard anything about it since, although the NYT "reported" that the FBI was going to bring charges of espionage against him? Did they plan on doing that any time soon? Or is this just another one of those things the Dems and their media cohorts do, make serious accusations without any evidence, get it cemented in prog "brains", then forget about it because it's nothing?