You are quite correct, and I would not like Obama if he was a Republican either.
In fact he could not be our American savior and redeemer if he was not a Democrat.
The very thought of Obama with an (R) is just repulsive and unwholesome.
.
check out the new Lollar web site -- Feb 12, 2010 :: Moneybomb for Charles Lollar.
It's time for Mr. Hoyer to retire. Help Lollar beat Hoyer this fall.
no,so it seems the Enterprise has now changed its long held policy as it is now publishing letters from political candidates in the paper.
Cheers.
.
I agree Hoyer needs to go, but do those in PG county? As long as Hoyer carries PG county it seems the rest of us don't matter. All the more reason for us to get busy and try to help Lollar spread his message in PG.
How early is too early to start campaigning? I pass two Bailey signs everyday on my way to work, but they've been up for 2 years now. I think he (Lollar) needs to get out a bit more, shaking the bushes yanno.
I knew there was a law about political signs and how long they are allowed to be up....I've wondered if the fact that Bailey changes the attachments to the signs has to do with how he is allowed to get around it...so I googled it....How early is too early to start campaigning? I pass two Bailey signs everyday on my way to work, but they've been up for 2 years now. I think he (Lollar) needs to get out a bit more, shaking the bushes yanno.
I knew there was a law about political signs and how long they are allowed to be up....I've wondered if the fact that Bailey changes the attachments to the signs has to do with how he is allowed to get around it...so I googled it....
I found that the law in St. Mary's Co USE TO be that the signs couldn't be erected more than 45 days before the election and must be removed 15 days after the election. However, in 2008 the ACLU challenged a similar law in Baltimore and won. The ACLU then wrote letters to other jurisdictions, including St. M's Co pointing out the court ruling and as a result, St. M's sought to amend the law, taking out the time limit on campaign road signs. I don't see any proof that the law was changed, but I assume it was.
So, bottom line, Bailey's signs have been up since he ran 2 years ago, he's not obliged to ever take them down. I don't think that necessarily means he will run in the next election. I imagine he will either take them down, or change the wording in support of Lollar when the time comes to make an irrevocable decision. The deadline to file as a candidate is July 6th, so we will know for sure then.
There are more than 2. One of the ones I always see is on a public right of way. But even on private property, it doesn't matter. Didn't one of Dyson's signs get yanked even though it was on his mother's property? That was a size issue, not a timing issue, but still...Both of the signs are on private property so maybe there's a loophole there.:shrug: The one in Chuck Co. is the one I see with different attachments.
There are more than 2. One of the ones I always see is on a public right of way. But even on private property, it doesn't matter. Didn't one of Dyson's signs get yanked even though it was on his mother's property? That was a size issue, not a timing issue, but still...
After listening to Lollar again today, I found out that he is gaining support in the northern part of the district and has changed his game plan to account for his increasing support there. Lollar's support is stronger in St Mary's and Calvert County, but he's polling well in PG county. He could easily pull off an upset.
Where can I get a Lollar bumper sticker (in St. Mary's)