SamSpade
Well-Known Member
Ann must have taken a page from my book - I've been saying this one a long time.
Ann Coulter - Official Home Page
The whole - "you don't need that (gun)(gun magazine)" argument is as pointless as any other. It only means this - I don't think you should have that, and I'm going to insist you don't have it.
What's not at all inconsistent is, they reverse roles when it is something they think people SHOULD be able to have, or should be able to do. Like public television and federally funded abortions.
If you want to own something, or do something, and it in no way harms anyone else - no one should be able to say "you don't need that" as their argument.
You don't need beer or cigarettes - should the government ban them, too?
Ann Coulter - Official Home Page
The whole - "you don't need that (gun)(gun magazine)" argument is as pointless as any other. It only means this - I don't think you should have that, and I'm going to insist you don't have it.
What's not at all inconsistent is, they reverse roles when it is something they think people SHOULD be able to have, or should be able to do. Like public television and federally funded abortions.
If you want to own something, or do something, and it in no way harms anyone else - no one should be able to say "you don't need that" as their argument.
You don't need beer or cigarettes - should the government ban them, too?