Hijinx
Well-Known Member
One of the reasons was communication between intel agencies, investigative agencies, and police forces was broken. If the CIA wanted to get intel to the FBI it had to go through all sorts of legal wranglings to get that info to them. This often stalled information and by the time it go to the other agency it had grown stale (no longer actionable). Read 'Able Danger' and how the DoD failed to get intel to the FBI when they were tracking the 911 terrorists (particularly Atta).
One of big tasks the DHS was given was to consolidate databases that collected terrorist and criminal information (criminal and terrorist tracking, photos, and fingerprints). These databases would be accessible by every federal and LE departments, and no legal loopholes to jump through. This was a huge undertaking. Many of the agencies were keeping paper records and had to scan decades worth of information to get it into these databases electronically.
I would say that this did not require creating an entirely new agency. This could have been assigned to any existing pre-911 agency (the FBI being best equipped for it). It would have required that agency be enlarged some.
But this is what we do when disaster happens. After WWII the 'National Security Act of 1947' gave birth to the Air Force, National Security Council, CIA, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. A massive expansion of government.
I believe I said basically the same thing in post number 6.
Homeland Security was another mistake Bush made without seeing the unintended consequences.
Once a Government Agency is formed it grows like Topsy, and they are seldom shut down.
There are other agencies that could be done away with also. The EPA being one of them.