☕️ Coffee & Covid 2025 🦠

[GURPS]

️ MEMENTO MORI ☙ Tuesday, April 22, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS ​

For jab watchers, it could not possibly be more obvious. The Pope’s health problems started within days of his first shot. And he went steadily, painfully downhill, as he continued with his second shot and then his special Fauci booster. And all his conditions reflect things we have learned to expect: systemic autoimmune, inflammatory, neurological, and cardiac conditions— followed by SADS.


It’s interesting to wonder about why Pope Francis stopped at three. Is it possible that, watching the Pope’s rapidly declining health, the Vatican’s doctors got buyer’s remorse? The magical health juice was just producing problems? Either way, just months after its vaccine passport policy started, in 2022, the Vatican quietly added a “natural immunity” exception to its vaccine mandate, which effectively ended it (though it wasn’t formally rescinded till last year).

In March 2022, the Vatican confirmed media’s inquiries that Pope Francis had his booster (his third shot) but —and this is the most curious fact of all— the Pope and the Vatican never got on the booster train, and never encouraged Catholics to “stay fully vaccinated.” The papal jab train halted without notice in early 2022.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch...efa2a-e623-48fc-b894-e495fa987b14_670x300.png
No act of love accompanied the bivalent booster. No moral imperative engaged for shot numbers 4, 5, or 6. Not even, or in spite of, the science.

We’ll never know. We’ll never know because they will never admit the jabs were anything but “safe and effective,” as the Pope had so often urged his worldwide flock. But it seems clear Pope Francis’ early messaging was not just morally coercive, but strategically deceptive: He pressured the whole world to do something he himself later stopped doing, without any explanation or apology.

Here’s the dreadfully ironic nub: the world’s leading vaccine salesman has become its most prominent implicit accuser. He didn’t need to recant. He didn’t need to apologize. His body did the talking.

The man who urged billions to roll up their sleeves—who called it an act of love, a moral duty—spent his final years in painful, cascading decline, hobbled, sickened, and ultimately silenced. And though the Vatican refuses to release the records, the silence around his boosters says more than any press release could. He stopped after three. No more acts of love. Just four years of suffering, and then the final stillness.

He stands now, in death, as a kind of cautionary relic. Not just a pope, but a memento mori for the biomedical faithful: a shocking reminder that it’s one thing to bless the altar, and another to lie under it.

Among the many headlines about the Pope’s death today, you will find all the grotesque, mendacious cover stories about the Pope’s “long history of respiratory struggles.” That’s the narrative, but believe me, they know.

We all know. And we will never, ever forget.

The same people who once shouted “trust the science” are now whispering, “don’t ask too many questions.” But it is too late for that. The damage is done. The records are sealed. The man is gone. What remains is an awkward silence where there should have been confession. We pray the Pope’s sins—unforgivable in this world—will be forgiven in the next.









Yes I am biter and vindictive, I hope the Marxist Pope Burns in Hell for all Eternity

 

[NOTSMC]

️ MEMENTO MORI ☙ Tuesday, April 22, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS ​

For jab watchers, it could not possibly be more obvious. The Pope’s health problems started within days of his first shot. And he went steadily, painfully downhill, as he continued with his second shot and then his special Fauci booster. And all his conditions reflect things we have learned to expect: systemic autoimmune, inflammatory, neurological, and cardiac conditions— followed by SADS.


It’s interesting to wonder about why Pope Francis stopped at three. Is it possible that, watching the Pope’s rapidly declining health, the Vatican’s doctors got buyer’s remorse? The magical health juice was just producing problems? Either way, just months after its vaccine passport policy started, in 2022, the Vatican quietly added a “natural immunity” exception to its vaccine mandate, which effectively ended it (though it wasn’t formally rescinded till last year).

In March 2022, the Vatican confirmed media’s inquiries that Pope Francis had his booster (his third shot) but —and this is the most curious fact of all— the Pope and the Vatican never got on the booster train, and never encouraged Catholics to “stay fully vaccinated.” The papal jab train halted without notice in early 2022.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/acfefa2a-e623-48fc-b894-e495fa987b14_670x300.png
No act of love accompanied the bivalent booster. No moral imperative engaged for shot numbers 4, 5, or 6. Not even, or in spite of, the science.

We’ll never know. We’ll never know because they will never admit the jabs were anything but “safe and effective,” as the Pope had so often urged his worldwide flock. But it seems clear Pope Francis’ early messaging was not just morally coercive, but strategically deceptive: He pressured the whole world to do something he himself later stopped doing, without any explanation or apology.

Here’s the dreadfully ironic nub: the world’s leading vaccine salesman has become its most prominent implicit accuser. He didn’t need to recant. He didn’t need to apologize. His body did the talking.

The man who urged billions to roll up their sleeves—who called it an act of love, a moral duty—spent his final years in painful, cascading decline, hobbled, sickened, and ultimately silenced. And though the Vatican refuses to release the records, the silence around his boosters says more than any press release could. He stopped after three. No more acts of love. Just four years of suffering, and then the final stillness.

He stands now, in death, as a kind of cautionary relic. Not just a pope, but a memento mori for the biomedical faithful: a shocking reminder that it’s one thing to bless the altar, and another to lie under it.

Among the many headlines about the Pope’s death today, you will find all the grotesque, mendacious cover stories about the Pope’s “long history of respiratory struggles.” That’s the narrative, but believe me, they know.

We all know. And we will never, ever forget.

The same people who once shouted “trust the science” are now whispering, “don’t ask too many questions.” But it is too late for that. The damage is done. The records are sealed. The man is gone. What remains is an awkward silence where there should have been confession. We pray the Pope’s sins—unforgivable in this world—will be forgiven in the next.









Yes I am biter and vindictive, I hope the Marxist Pope Burns in Hell for all Eternity

Give me a break. JD slipped him a mickey.

 

[GURPS]

️ BABY LIES ☙ Wednesday, April 30, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS ​

As usual, the media’ fairy tale begins falling apart almost immediately. I relied on the activist lawyers’ own court filings for most of this information. Here’s a link to the initial petition.

First of all, VML’s parents are not married. VML has always lived with her mother, “Jenny” Carolina Lopez Villela. But —and this is the part that will blow your mind— VML’s biological father is also an illegal Honduran alien, and is also subject to immediate deportation whenever ICE catches up with him. It’s right in his own petition (Note that ‘Harper’ is a New Orleans INS agent):



In other words, according to Adiel, New Orleans INS offered him a free flight to Honduras so he could go with his daughter. Apparently, he didn’t like that option. Good thing he had free lawyers helping him.

In its response, the government said it offered for the father, Adiel, to come in and prove his identity as the father, but he declined, since he’d be deported. INS said it wasn’t about to turn over a 2-year-old baby to an unidentified man. The INS also said that Jenny said she wanted VML to stay with her, and signed a handwritten statement to that effect (albeit without counsel).

But Daddy had another, bigger problem. As a non-citizen, it is doubtful he had standing to bring the case. So his lawyers arranged a neat legal trick, a judicial switcheroo. Daddy’s activist lawyers got him to sign a form temporarily assigning his parental rights to his ‘sister in law,’ Trish Mack. Trish, a U.S. citizen, could bring the action, and they all filed about ten seconds later.



But Trish’s affidavit, attached to the Petition, doesn’t say she is Adiel’s sister-in-law. She’s just a ‘friend.’ She’s only known Adiel for about a year. It doesn’t say how she knows him. Based on the emerging pattern, my guess is Adiel was living in her casita. From the affidavit (linked here):



How well? Nevermind. The point is, Politico and the rest of corporate media are outright lying by calling her the sister-in-law, to conceal the troubling fact that she’s just some random friend with no relationship whatever to baby VML.

But wait. It gets even better. Trish might not know Adiel so well after all. In her affidavit, Trish admitted she doesn’t know all the facts, not really:



So … what on Earth is going on here? If the case succeeds, and baby VML is returned from Honduras and turned over to Adiel, they’ll both be immediately deported back to Honduras. How is that in the child’s best interest? Or, would Adiel return to Honduras, while VML would stay here with … who? Trish? Trish only accepted provisional placement. Best case, VML would wind up in Louisiana’s foster care system.

How is that in VML’s best interest?

The whole lawsuit is a sick joke wrapped in a fig leaf. What they really want —without ever saying it out loud or in print— is for VML’s mother to be flown back from Honduras under humanitarian parole so she can “care for” VML, while a long, noisy court case drenched in media coverage drags out. It’s not about protecting the child. It’s about buying time, slowing the mass deportations, and building headlines.

Thank goodness, for once, ICE didn’t blink and move on to easier targets.

The many corporate media stories about baby VML mention none of these complications or the readily available additional context. But I thought you should know the truth.

We really don’t hate the corporate media nearly enough.



The 1st half of the blog post is about the media lies about the ' deported ' American Citizen

 

[GURPS]

️ MRNA MAYHEM ☙ Saturday, May 10, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS ​

Appropos for Mother’s Day, a quiet March jab study made the rounds this week. The study, published in the Journal Vaccines, was blandly titled, “Impact of mRNA and Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccines on Ovarian Reserve.” Scoffers complained it was “only” a rat study, but it was another iron nail in mRNA’s coffin.



The truth is: it was more terrible news for the jabs. The slow trickle of truth emerging in the scientific journals is reaching a cacophonous crescendo. This newest study confirmed the worst suspicions of many folks who’ve long suspected a link between plunging worldwide fertility rates and the simultaneous worldwide deployment of the mRNA vaccines.

For heterodox experts who’ve long warned, “Something this widespread with this kind of novel platform could have unintended reproductive effects,” this study landed like a flashing red light. It doesn’t settle the debate— but it clearly shifts the burden of proof. The dismissive “safe and effective” mantra now looks a lot less like a conclusion and more like a placeholder awaiting serious investigation.

This new peer-reviewed animal study raises questions that demand answers about the human effects of covid vaccines —especially the mRNA types— specifically on female fertility. The researchers gave rats human-equivalent doses of either Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine or Sinovac’s inactivated spike vaccine. A few weeks later, they checked the furry little volunteers’ ovarian tissues.

What they found was extremely sinister. Both vaccines disrupted normal ovarian function, both reducing the number of healthy egg follicles and increasing the number of dying or damaged ones. Hormone levels tied to fertility, particularly “anti-Müllerian hormone” (AMH), dropped significantly— and most sharply in the mRNA group. In plain English: the rats had fewer eggs and significant signs of reproductive stress.



‘Follicles’ are the functional core of a woman’s reproductive system— they’re tiny fluid-filled sacs in the ovaries that each contain an immature egg. Every menstrual cycle, a woman’s body selects a few of these follicles to mature. Ideally, one of them releases a viable egg during ovulation. But here’s the catch: women are born with a fixed number of follicles, and once they’re gone, that’s it. No replacements; you get what you get. This finite supply is called the ovarian reserve, and it determines both a woman’s reproductive lifespan and her fertility potential.

While rats aren’t humans, the biological mechanisms are close enough to be terrifying. Rats have ovarian follicles and reproductive hormones remarkably similar to humans, which is why they’re widely used in reproductive research. While there are some differences in timing and hormonal cycles, the fundamental biology is the same.

Not only did the study show damage to the follicles themselves, but it evidenced that vaccination —especially with mRNA— disrupts hormone signaling related to fertility, by reducing the AMH hormone that indicates how many viable eggs remain. That single finding could plausibly explain the widespread reports of disrupted menstrual cycles following covid vaccination.

The study didn’t look at direct ‘fertility outcomes’ (actually getting pregnant), but it showed clear changes to the structures and hormones that make fertility possible in the first place. The findings don’t prove the vaccines harm human fertility— but they demolished the idea that there’s no evidence of harm.

There is now conclusive evidence of harm, even if not conclusive proof. And the evidence is strong, consistent, biologically credible, and peer-reviewed.

This study suggests the FDA skipped a critical step: before mass deployment, this kind of reproductive impact should have been studied in depth. Instead, it’s only being belatedly noticed by independent researchers after the needled horse is out of the barn. More research in human women is urgently needed— not to create panic, but to finally take the question seriously.

Global fertility rates have been declining for years, blamed largely on socioeconomic trends like delayed childbearing, urbanization, and falling marriage rates. But what’s grabbed everyone’s attention was the sharp acceleration in the decline during 2021–2023— a period that coincides almost exactly with the worldwide rollout of mRNA covid vaccines.

In some countries, birth rates dropped 7%–15% year-over-year, far beyond typical demographic variation, and without any clear alternative explanation.

For example, here’s a March, 2024, headline from The Lancet:



This rat study didn’t prove causation, but it showed a plausible mechanism: vaccination-induced follicular loss, reproductive hormone disruption, and increased ovarian apoptosis (cell death). If a similar effect occurred in women —even temporarily— it could reduce fecundity (the ability to conceive) during at least that window.

And since conception is already a narrow, monthly biological opportunity, small disruptions across large populations could have macro-level fertility effects— especially in low-replacement societies already teetering below 2.1 births per woman. A global birth rate collapse would be a slow-motion extinction event. It would creep up until some awful tipping point was reached and then it would quickly be game over.

The study resolved a critical question: is this possible? The next question demanding an answer now is, why aren’t public health authorities urgently conducting large-scale reproductive follow-up studies on women of childbearing age, using easily detectable markers like AMH and antral follicle counts?

The reluctance to blame jab makers and government jab pushers is a poor reason to delay urgently needed research. It’s not just “water under the bridge,” or as Hillary might ask, “at this point, what does it matter?” The point is that, if we can identify the cause, we can start working on the cure.



The longer we tiptoe around the possibility that mass vaccination campaigns might have played a role in plummeting fertility, the longer we delay both accountability and solutions. Because if the shots are indeed part of the problem, then understanding how they affect reproduction is the first step to developing interventions, reversals, and informed screening. This isn’t (only) about blame; it’s about basic public health triage: find the bleeding artery and clamp it, even if it clobbers the credibility of a few cockroach-like public health experts.

Our public health experts are obviously corrupt, sold-out, and useless. Hopefully, President Trump’s new HHS will notice this study and fund more research stat.

​