PeoplesElbow
Well-Known Member
This was a case for felony murder (commit a felony and someone gets killed its felony murder) but Fritz kept saying over and over "in for a dime, in for a dollar" as if he thought some catch phrase would get him a conviction.I sat on a couple of cases, don't know if Fritz was the prosecutor or one of his staff.
Personally don't know the man, I do know there are some people who don't like him, but obviously more do like him or he wouldn't get elected.
In my cases it was the comments from the other jurors that amazed me. The one case they picked up the guy when cops raided the house for another reason. He had a hell of a lot of weed. But the judge said that quantity alone is not a measure of intent to distribute.
The guy claimed he was visiting his cousin for the weekend and this large quantity was for his personal consumption.
Even though he had a small scale and some empty bags. Not being a user, I'm like, BS, that's way to much for personal use.
But there were a couple of people with "experience" that said they would have no problem using that much over a long weekend.
His entire case was more defending the felony murder definition than actually trying to convict the defendant.
Conversely I was a juror on a federal case, those prosecutors were excellent