Biden on TV said they cheated what more does anyone need to look into the cheat that everyone knows happened and we all know 80,000,000 people did not vote for him he would be lucky if 10,000,000 did
I don't remember that, but as addle-brained as he is, it wouldn't surprise me. And then an Easter Bunny would jump in to keep him from saying more.
Before anyone even brought up specific cases that have been brought up - my primary skepticism arose from THIS - one of my favorite spots on the Web is David Leip's Presidential Atlas.
https://uselectionatlas.org/ No opinion, just easy to access facts in easy to read tables and charts.
What I notice is a pattern for decades that voter turnout and voter increase from presidential election to the next tends to fall into a rather predictable pattern.
Total Votes Winner
1976 81 million 40 million
1980 86 million 44 million
1984 92 million 54 million
1988 91 million 49 million
1992 104 million 45 million
1996 96 million 47 million
2000 105 million 50 million
2004 122 million 62 million
2008 131 million 69 million
2012 129 million 65 million
2016 137 million 63 million
2020 158 million 81 million (Loser: 74 million).
You'll notice that, from year to year, voter participation may vary, but it's usually predictable, and the winner's total increases slightly over time (as does the total vote, because more voters come of age, for one thing).
A couple years buck the trend, and for good reason - in '92, the first third party candidate with ANY shot became popular and at one point - before he tempoarily dropped out - it was believed he could WIN. Why do I think the Perot effect? Because four years later, it went back down, along with Perot's votes. While 2004 befuddles me somewhat, it is no surprise at all that 2008 sticks out - it was the first time a Black man ran for President atop one of the two major parties. Of COURSE there would be huge voter turnout.
But you will also notice that the WINNER doesn't change an awful lot. It's still pretty amazing that it took twenty years for a candidate to beat Reagan's re-election total.
But there's somethign AWFULLY WEIRD about 2020. In 2020, a man without much of a message, zero charisma, barely campaigned and who could not draw an audience of more than a few hundred OBLITERATED Obama's previous record of 69 million votes, which he HIMSELF did not beat in 2012. Nor did Hillary, the first WOMAN to head a ticket.
No, it isn't statistically logical that that sort of man would totally annihilate every previous presidential vote record. The ONLY case that could be made is, they made it so abundantly easy to vote, that millions more decided to do it, without the excuse of "Couldn't make it to the polls" or "Lines were too long" and so on.
But I also have to mention that the more opportunities and more means to vote, at more locations and times also translates into much LESS secure elections, especially when you have places like drop boxes with virtually zero security. It is illogical to assume that you can make an election MORE secure with less security and more options for voting.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
