This_person
Well-Known Member
Some thoughts..
You clearly use the term loosely.
No...he was 19...that is not a child.
Can't really be sure. She thinks it was maybe when she was 15, which makes him 17. But, she's not sure she was 15, so there's not a chance in hell we know how old he was.
This is a LIFETIME appt. We had better be damned sure we are putting qualified people into the position.
What would make a drunken groping by a teenage boy disqualifying to this appointment?
Here's the "however"...I completely agree...however...this guy appears to have lied in prior Senate testimony
About what? What did he say that was a lie?