Larry Gude
Strung Out
...assuming all other things remaining the same, if men were the ones that got pregnant, would abortion have long been covered by insurance or would it be treated as it is today; a point of never ending contention?
Abortion and men...
- Thread starter Larry Gude
- Start date
Of course.
Larry Gude
Strung Out
And with that, our work here is done. Time to wrap it up and head home early!
kwillia
n/a
Dur... of course they would...
» Medicare Has Spent a Quarter-Billion Taxpayer Dollars on Penis Pumps - Big Government
» Medicare Has Spent a Quarter-Billion Taxpayer Dollars on Penis Pumps - Big Government
Larry Gude
Strung Out
And then women would be men and, thus, all their stuff would be covered and thus the question would still stand.
E
EmptyTimCup
Guest
the non baby carrying gender would 'demand' it so they would not be tied down to a mistake ........
Larry Gude
Strung Out
the non baby carrying gender would 'demand' it so they would not be tied down to a mistake ........
You know. This brings up an interesting point. If men were the ones that got pregnant and, as per my question, all other things remained the same, instead of "Not tonight. I have a headache" women could, suggest an alternative activity...
kwillia
n/a
Chasey_Lane
Salt Life
If men got pregnant the human species would be extinct.
ftcret
New Member
PsyOps
Pixelated
Reruns of Super Bowl XVII :shrug:
PsyOps
Pixelated
I get where you're going with this (re: the Penis Pump thread), but the abortion issue for most people (that are against it) isn't about sex; it's about life. So it wouldn't matter who got pregnant.
Larry Gude
Strung Out
Yes, it would. Do you not see the abject disconnect between not wanting to provide coverage for abortions on the one hand and the near immediate covering of ED pills???
"As we stride the world as gods with our fully erect, chemically enhanced pee pee's so that we may penetrate and ejaculate anywhere, any time with great pleasure and virility, thine woman shall be stuck with the consequences. And get me a sammitch while you're at it..."
Larry Gude
Strung Out
... like clean the kitchen...
No.
Come on, people! I tee this one up and no one wants to take a whack at it?
puggymom
Active Member
Sorry I have been trying really hard not to get into debates having to to with abortion.No.
Come on, people! I tee this one up and no one wants to take a whack at it?
I'll give you a
for this though (assuming the facetiousness of the quote of course)
itsbob
I bowl overhand
Well, if all things were the same the need for abortions and birth control would be greatly reduced.
Part of the BC argument was BC was needed due to abusive husbands that didn't care if they could afford another child or not, or what the woman had to put up with trying to do her "chores" while 8 months pregnant, and taking of 3 other kids all under the age of 5, while he wasn't bringing home enough money to feed any of them.
IF all things were equal, HE wouldn't allow himself to become pregnant if it got in the way of his activities or work, or golf game.
BC would not only been acceptable much earlier on, but would have been legal from the very beginning, you know, when men made the rules that woman had to abide by.
Back then women were submissive to the men, it's just the way it was, and IF all things were the same the MAN would say, not tonight, or let me put the galoshes on first.. whereas the way it was she would just spread her legs and he would have his way, and it was his choice if he chose to use BC or not (if it was allowed).
Both BC and abortion wouldn't even be questioned, as still today, the laws of the land are predominantly made by men. You'd still get your religious folks trying to fight it, but yes I'd say not only legal, but paid for by either insurance or govt subsidy.