Park Hall road.489?
Park Hall road.489?
^that, I've said that for years now. If I get a call or text, I pull off the road before I even look at my phone. I removed the bluetooth connection to my phone in my car cuz I want to concentrate on driving not yapping or texting.Cell phones, IMHO, cause more traffic infractions than anything else.
Speeding isn't the whole problem. Although, with less experienced drivers, it can be a very bad mix.
Cell phones, IMHO, cause more traffic infractions than anything else. I'm addicted to my phone, but my main focus is always on the road. I watch my lane so intently, that I've passed my fiancé' head on without seeing her, in a damned Jeep that I paid for. I always watch straight ahead and off the the right for an escape route, only glancing into on coming traffic from time to time.
The younger generation just have priorities mixed up. Take your eyes off the phone until you're stopped.
Lucky girl! Sis and I avoided a head on a couple of weeks ago. We were behind friends going NB on 235 south of gate 3 and someone SB crossed all the way over into the NB lane. Fortunately, our friends were able to go onto the shoulder to avoid it. We followed and did the same.I always devote a small piece of attention to oncoming constantly. The risk of head on may be low but its never zero unless there is no traffic. And I view it like we assign risk hazard to things in test. According to both probability and severity. Rear ending the person ahead of you or behind you is more probable, but carries a much lower severity than a head on.
In fact, were it not for doing that my daughter might not be here. A druggie who just got done stealing stuff from Hattons Rest Farm and came at her head on in his borrowed car as she was heading up the hill that way on 5. She was able to dodge the head on, and even though he target fixated on her and corrected to keep head on she kept driving and veered left one last time took the hit on the left side of her Honda Fit.
View attachment 188449
Park hall road489?
Lucky girl! Sis and I avoided a head on a couple of weeks ago. We were behind friends going NB on 235 south of gate 3 and someone SB crossed all the way over into the NB lane. Fortunately, our friends were able to go onto the shoulder to avoid it. We followed and did the same.
Good training!It was the sort of luck that favors the prepared mind. We talked later and she specifically mentioned the extra training I gave her. Don't panic, dont blindly jerk the wheel away or jam the brakes, try for the best crash you can get. Always have a plan. KEEP DRIVING!!!!!
Might sound like simple stuff, but its not really covered in driver training.
We had a fatal like what you describe in that area a few years ago, IIRC. That person went for the shoulder as well, and the oncoming nailed them there. But I'm not sure I'm recalling it right, maybe a Ford Ranger involved?
I sure wouldn't want to hit an elk. Like a cement wall.Family has an ongoing group text. Today was all the local accidents.
Montana was silent, until he piped up with "All we have to watch out for is elk."
Smart*ss.
On stilts even. That's the problem there. Like a moose, you take the legs that massive coming in the windshield.I sure wouldn't want to hit an elk. Like a cement wall.
I'm not oblivious to oncoming traffic, but the roads that I travel, I'm more concerned with buggies and tractors. I've had to swerve a few times from oncoming, but not in my daily travels. Good on you for teaching your children well. Too many don't take the time.I always devote a small piece of attention to oncoming constantly. The risk of head on may be low but its never zero unless there is no traffic. And I view it like we assign risk hazard to things in test. According to both probability and severity. Rear ending the person ahead of you or behind you is more probable, but carries a much lower severity than a head on.
In fact, were it not for doing that my daughter might not be here. A druggie who just got done stealing stuff from Hattons Rest Farm and came at her head on in his borrowed car as she was heading up the hill that way on 5. She was able to dodge the head on, and even though he target fixated on her and corrected to keep head on she kept driving and veered left one last time took the hit on the left side of her Honda Fit.
View attachment 188449
Coming back from Leonardtown on 5/21, I saw at least three serious accidents in ONE day. Too many accidents. Very little seems to be done to reduce all of these accidents. Actually, I think it was a total of 4,Lucky girl! Sis and I avoided a head on a couple of weeks ago. We were behind friends going NB on 235 south of gate 3 and someone SB crossed all the way over into the NB lane. Fortunately, our friends were able to go onto the shoulder to avoid it. We followed and did the same.
Longer ago than I thought. And exactly what Patti was up against. People in a panic target lock, they fixate on what they think they are going to crash into. The downside to that is that the brain is funny. It sorta wants to drive towards whatever you are looking at. On the track, they tech you to always look where you wanna go, not at what's in front of you. Except drag racers, of courseGood training!
I don't recall the Ford Ranger accident.
Do you spit out your gum before driving also ?^that, I've said that for years now. If I get a call or text, I pull off the road before I even look at my phone. I removed the bluetooth connection to my phone in my car cuz I want to concentrate on driving not yapping or texting.
I had a near miss on rt 249 last week. The guy coming at me head-on had his cell phone on top of his steering wheel texting away. Fortunately, 249 has wide shoulders that I could use to get away from him.Lucky girl! Sis and I avoided a head on a couple of weeks ago. We were behind friends going NB on 235 south of gate 3 and someone SB crossed all the way over into the NB lane. Fortunately, our friends were able to go onto the shoulder to avoid it. We followed and did the same.
Nope. I assume that they will continue to let the body count (and car insurance premiums) stack up like they have for the last SEVERAL years. Like I said before, apparently the sheriffs are too busy chasing down serial murderers and drug lords to do that part of their jobDo you really think that the Commissioners are going to allow the Sheriff's Department, or the MSP for that matter, to **** with people working at the County's largest employer?