Adios MFers

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
Plain English would be:

"Guy has a point and there's some constitutional authority and precedence behind it, but the case should be decided in Texas where it took place, not in DC."
But it does say that, just a different form of plain English.

POTUS, via EO, determined that the AEA (the law) would apply to illegal migrant Venezuelans over 14 and identified as being part of TDA. The AEA is almost completely unencumbered by judicial review unless making a habeas appeal, which must be adjudicated where the removed is being detained. So the questions, as I see them, are; 1) was the law legally used? Yes. 2) was the alien enemy identified? Yes, by the EO. 3) was there an error in the identity of the alien enemy? Doesn't seem to be, but if the detainee makes a challenge it would be verified by a court with jurisdiction at the incarceration location. That didn't happen because of judge shopping.
 

itsbob

I bowl overhand
The Supremes say Trump can indeed deport criminal illegal alien gangs. And OBTW, DC isn't the correct jurisdiction - Texas is - so Boasberg can eat a turd.

Reading the opposing opinion I found it interesting that the constituion wasn't mentioned once. They were upset, it was unfair, immoral.. it hurt their feels.. but not once did they provide any information in regards to the majority getting it wrong per the constitution.
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
Plain English is....plain. It's to the point and doesn't go on for an eternity saying what could be said in one paragraph.

You just like to argue.
We are talking about litigation, right? Isn't it always about arguing?
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
We are talking about litigation, right? Isn't it always about arguing?

So tedious. I used to be married to this person who loved nothing more than to go on and on and on and on and on until everyone around him was ready to open a vein. It got to where he'd start a discussion and I'd flat tell him, "Two sentences to make your point and get my attention, otherwise I'm ignoring you."

You're not litigating *with me* and you're not going to convince me that more blather is better.
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
You're not litigating *with me* and you're not going to convince me that more blather is better.
Didn't say I was. but we are discussing it, right? As to the wordiness of this decision you get it all in the first 4 pages. The rest is just telling you the why, or the why not of it.
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
IMG_2322.jpeg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BOP
Top