Alex Jones - Returns

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Alex Jones Applauds Musk For Reinstating Him, Warns The ‘Establishment’ Will ‘Come After Him’




Infowars founder Alex Jones applauded billionaire Elon Musk on Sunday for reinstating him to X (formerly Twitter), but gave a sharp warning that “big establishment sponsors” will “come after him.”

Jones was reinstated on the social media platform Saturday night following a Twitter poll asking users if they would want the Infowars founder back on the site. After almost 2 million votes, results showed that 70.1% of responders wanted Jones back on.

The Infowars founder joined his first Twitter space Sunday afternoon to discuss his thoughts on how it feels to be back on the platform since being banned in 2018 for alleged abusive behavior. When asked if he believed that Musk would possibly receive backlash for reinstating him, Jones stated that while it might “monetarily” hurt the platform, Musk is a “rebel.”

“Well, I think you said that yesterday … But he basically said it’s the right thing to do because the principle and it’s also what the majority of the vote said. So this probably will hurt X monetarily but ‘justice be done, may the heavens fall’ basically,” Jones stated. “But at the end of the day, it already has way more traffic and way more people — it’s avant-garde, it’s revolutionary, it’s rebel, it’s Maverick.”
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
It should be evident to all - that it's still a free country and if we permit jerks like Howard Stern to broadcast for 40 years, everyone ought to have that freedom.

I'm not a fan of Jones, but it wouldn't surprise me at all if the left tries to make a huge stink over this and attempts to tarnish Musk over it.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
I'm not a fan of Jones, but it wouldn't surprise me at all if the left tries to make a huge stink over this and attempts to tarnish Musk over it.


Oh of course the left will ... keening and wailing

The Anti Semitic accusation did not stick too hard and Musk clarified his point in a follow up tweet
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
FREEDOM is when someone you don't like has the right to say what they want.
OPPRESSION is when someone is denied their right to say what they want.

Oh, the person denied the right might - today - be someone you like, but sooner or later, it will be someone you agree with, and their voice will be silenced. And you MIGHT find yourself in a situation where you wish - damn, if we only had LAWS to keep people from shutting others up.

THIS - is why we make laws - so that rights and freedom are not subject to the whims of a party or a single executive. So you can't have a mayor - or governor - or President - or God help us all, a mob or social media - singularly DECIDE what should be said -
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
THIS - is why we make laws - so that rights and freedom are not subject to the whims of a party or a single executive.


Indeed, but as you know this is what the Progressives want to change, they ' feel ' and are offended so they demands changes to protect feelings not being exposed to speech that offends them
 

glhs837

Power with Control
So we want to give felons the right to vote, but not let this guy speak? If he fvcks up again, sue his ass again.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
Indeed, but as you know this is what the Progressives want to change, they ' feel ' and are offended so they demands changes to protect feelings not being exposed to speech that offends them
Again - AGAIN, returns to the "politics is religion" - political opinions are dogma - all issues have a single solution and we have the only right one -

Just as a religious leader feels the right to silence dissent as infidelity or treason - so the left does. Hence, it's ok to silence "wrong" ideas.

I've been around religious leaders who think this way - they may appear pleasant, but make no mistake, they will never tolerate dissent - or even light-hearted ridicule. Sooner or later, they will address it as dissension within the ranks. And they have NO PROBLEM whatsoever in utterly reversing an opinion which two minutes ago was set in stone. If they have an opinion on a Scripture and other leaders concur - it's the right one, you have a right to yours but keep it to yourself.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

BASED Elon Musk MOVES TO REINSTATE Alex Jones On X After Woke Advertiser Boycott BACKFIRES!​


 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Alex Jones WINS For Now, Woke Corporate Press COLLAPSING, US Social Order IS DYING & Jones PROVES IT​






 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
🔥 🔥 Before they unleashed the hellscape of lawfare on President Trump, they law-bombed bombastic conservative talk-show host Alex Jones into oblivion. The AP ran a story yesterday headlined, “Alex Jones could lose his Infowars platform to pay for Sandy Hook conspiracy lawsuit.

image.png

In 2022, Alex filed for bankruptcy protection after being successfully sued by several relatives of victims of the 2012 Newtown, Connecticut Sandy Hook school shooting that killed 20 first graders and six teachers.

The trouble started when, right after the shooting, InfoWars initially expressed skepticism and aired contradictions and inconsistencies in the media reporting about the shooting. Some of Jones’ criticisms unfortunately turned out to be unfounded hot takes, even though some details remain unexplained. The relatives testified they were traumatized by Jones’ theories, and their feelings were hurt by peoples’ online speculations that the shooting was a false flag operation.

If not entirely novel, the legal theories used to sue Jones in multiple lawsuits were at minimum very creative. The infernal strategy of filing multiple cases in multiple jurisdictions multiplies the chance of getting a friendly judge and jury, multiplies the defendant’s costs, wrecks his ability to afford a good defense, and multiplies the collective case’s complexity, making it infinitely harder to defend, all while undermining the defendant’s right to a fair venue.

In 2022, juries awarded the plaintiffs a majestic $1.4 billion judgment in Connecticut and a littler $49 million judgment in Texas. The judgments are against both InfoWars and Jones personally. These jury verdicts instantly made history, although you’ll be forgiven for not knowing that fact.

No one in history has ever been awarded so much for harmful speech.

Jones filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, and tried to propose a plan for reorganization that would have paid the plaintiffs off over time. But the plaintiffs successfully objected to that plan, and now, according to AP, Jones wants to switch to Chapter 7 liquidation, and just give them InfoWars to try to run without him. Meanwhile, the plaintiffs have sued him again in separate, new cases, arguing he’s shifted or hidden money.

It’s tempting to conclude the lawsuits against Jones are more about shutting him up for political reasons than actually compensating the victims’ relatives for their damaged feelings over Jones repeating some widely spread conspiracy theories.

Like President Trump, Jones is a fighter. It’s not over yet.



 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
I have always thought he was a nut - but

The First Amendment PROTECTS the people we think are nut cases, because sooner or later, someone will think the same of us.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
I have always thought he was a nut - but

The First Amendment PROTECTS the people we think are nut cases, because sooner or later, someone will think the same of us.


Yep, The left went after Alex Jones, Then Trump, what chance do you stand ...
 
Top