I doubt that you've ever signed a DD-254.
I doubt you have a clue what one is or where the signature line is.
All Signs Point to Russia Being Behind DNC Hack
- Thread starter nhboy
- Start date
I doubt you have a clue what one is or where the signature line is.
nhboy
Ubi bene ibi patria
warneckutz
Well-Known Member
Russia? Their excuse is as fruity and lame as you. I see why you support them.
Tell us then security God, what do YOU think it is.
Did I miss something here? I believe that to be the correct form number.
It is.
nhboy
Ubi bene ibi patria
You better contact the Dept. of Defense, because they think it is.
http://www.dami.army.pentagon.mil/site/IndustSec/DD254.aspx
Lurk
Happy Creepy Ass Cracka
Boy is just cranky 'cause he hasn't had his ration of Mac and Cheese yet today.
nhboy
Ubi bene ibi patria
He never signed a DD Form 254.
Okay.
here you go boy ....
http://www.dami.army.pentagon.mil/site/IndustSec/DD254.aspx
The intention of a DD Form 254 is to convey security requirements, classification guidance and provide handling procedures for classified material received and/or generated on a classified contract. The DD Form 254 is a resource for providing security requirements and classification guidance to a contractor. The DD Form 254 is a U.S. publication referenced in the DFAR and applied to contracts involving access to classified information by U.S. contractors. If the contract is with non-US Industry (foreign governments, cleared foreign companies or international organizations) additional guidance is on a case-by-case basis. The Industrial Security Implementing Agreement (to the General Security of Military Information Agreement) is the overarching authority for the bilateral protection of classified information with foreign governments. Any guidance provided to contractors to explain protection requirements for classified information exchanged under bilateral agreements must be conveyed through security contract clauses, and not a DD Form 254.
The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) requires that a DD Form 254, Contract Security Classification Specification, be integrated in each classified contract. The DD Form 254 provides the contractor (or a subcontractor) security requirements and the classification guidance that is necessary to execute a classified contract.
This_person
Well-Known Member
My guess is that boy thought they meant DD214 because he'd heard of that before - then declared one had never been signed. When the accuracy was pointed out, he just stuck with being wrong.
nhboy
Ubi bene ibi patria
glhs837
Power with Control
Perhaps boys point is that a person being asked to safeguard classified would not be asked to sign a -254. From what I read, it's signed by a certifying official stating that the contractors planned procedures for protecting classified are deemed adequate. So I would never have signed one, and never would Ms Clinton. Not even sure what contractor would have been in play here, but by all accounts, any certifying official would not even have been aware that the server existed to certify, and since it was an appointed officials server, not one run by a contractor, although maybe the company that provided the web portal for that server might have been a contractor? But they entered into a contract with a private employee of the Clintons, to start right? So it was a private business deal, not a company being contracted by the Fed to nadle classified. Hell, they probably had no idea that classified would be stored on the server they were servicing.
As always with the Clintons, it's a shell game with 20 damn shells.
As always with the Clintons, it's a shell game with 20 damn shells.
I agree. Then everyone saying it was "the Russians", most notably the FBI, are lying. :shrug:
You know that...how, exactly? Got his employment history in a file somewhere?
My guess is he's just being contrary and provocative.
That would be different.