And here I thought Trump's Supreme appointments were going to eviscerate Roe?

Kinnakeet

Well-Known Member
It's not.

The term "murder" is a legal adjudication. It doesn't exist on it's own. An homicide (or in this case infanticide) isn't murder unless a court says so.

Stop using emotions to make your point.

Abortion is wrong any way you want to look at it. Of this, there is no question - we do not disagree.

The way I've look at it is: If we're going to run our country according to the Constitution, then who do you want making these decisions? The government? NO THANKS.

Such is the risk of freedom. If you don't like the risks, you are free to choose to live in a less free country. Me? I'll live with the dangers.
Agree..wait did I agree with him...lol
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
It's not.

The term "murder" is a legal adjudication.

Yes. So is marriage. One does not supersede the other.

It doesn't exist on it's own. An homicide (or in this case infanticide) isn't murder unless a court says so.

And yet the word exists. Oddly enough, it pre-dates the use of it in court.
Kinda like saying "gay" only means homosexual.

You know what he is saying. You CAN discuss the matter.

What you're DOING, however, is telling him to shut the hell up because he's 'wrong', which is precisely the same thing
you accuse others of doing - evading discussion or debate, because your opinion on a subject is the immutable truth.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
What you're DOING, however, is telling him to shut the hell up because he's 'wrong', which is precisely the same thing
you accuse others of doing - evading discussion or debate, because your opinion on a subject is the immutable truth.

:notworthy:
 
Top