Barabbas
Active Member
I'm guessing you were looking in the mirror as you typed that.............not as long as yours is.
I'm guessing you were looking in the mirror as you typed that.............not as long as yours is.
Now , would that be factual data or alternative factual date like kellyanne Conway uses?Unless, of course, you review the data.
And Trump is still your president...and will be until January 2025.............not as long as yours is.
Not surprising you'ed be incorrect again.I'm guessing you were looking in the mirror as you typed that.
I'm not sure what data Mrs. Conway uses. I just look at facts.Now , would that be factual data or alternative factual date like kellyanne Conway uses?
You should have beenNot surprising you'ed be incorrect again.
I see your class in school hasn't covered how to read a calendar yet ?And Trump is still your president...and will be until January 2025.
See, Gilligan's comment required a higher-cognitive level of comprehension. It was obviating the assumption that Mr. Trump will win re-election this year.I see your class in school hasn't covered how to read a calendar yet ?
Now , would that be factual data or alternative factual date like kellyanne Conway uses?
Unless it's pro trump of course.
I see your class in school hasn't covered how to read a calendar yet ?
See, Gilligan's comment required a higher-cognitive level of comprehension. It was obviating the assumption that Mr. Trump will win re-election this year.
Get a ****ing room.
Get a ****ing room.
So you do use the alternative fact methods , cool.
See, Gilligan's comment required a higher-cognitive level of comprehension. It was obviating the assumption that Mr. Trump will win re-election this year.
You a betting feller?
Yep, you and nh/spitter would get along fine.