BeaverDam Pet Food
- Thread starter Ponytail
- Start date
Chasey_Lane
Salt Life
It is REALLY cold outside. Someone hurry and go to Florida and bring back some warm weather.
itsbob
I bowl overhand
pixiegirl said:
*unshunned*
That's not what your post said, it didn't say "had an allergic reaction" but
"with potentialy allergic ingredients."
That would be about 50% of anyones diet. We all eat and inhale potentially allergic ingredients everyday. I'm not going to stop feeding him milk because milk is a potential allergen, but if he does display an allergy then of course we'd change his diet.
I'm not going to survey every food item that comes into my house for Nicholas for potential allergens (and not buy them just on the potential of an allergic reaction), unless there is an already known allergy. Hell, I've tested fate and even fed him PEANUT BUTTER!!
*shunned*
Now, about Nomo's double wide.. where were we??
:dwightschrute:
pixiegirl
Cleopatra Jones
itsbob said:
Now, about Nomo's double wide.. where were we??
Obviously you didn't get far with nomo's ass either.....
I thought you were done? Or did you think I was gone for the day and thus opportunity to have the last word knocked?
So you're saying that if there's a good possibility that your child could have an allergic reaction to something that also offers him NO nutritional benefit you'll feed it to him anyway because it's cheaper? If that's ok with you than it's ok with me. I didn't base my argument soley on allergies but on nutritional value as well.
Chasey_Lane
Salt Life
Not because it is cheaper here, but because it tastes good.pixiegirl said:
Cowgirl
Well-Known Member
pixiegirl said:Obviously you didn't get far with nomo's ass either.....
I thought you were done? Or did you think I was gone for the day and thus opportunity to have the last word knocked?
So you're saying that if there's a good possibility that your child could have an allergic reaction to something that also offers him NO nutritional benefit you'll feed it to him anyway because it's cheaper? If that's ok with you than it's ok with me. I didn't base my argument soley on allergies but on nutritional value as well.
So, by your argument, you wouldn't recommend feeding your dog the food with the synthetic vitamin K....right? It offers little nutritional benefit and has the possibility to harm her?
pixiegirl
Cleopatra Jones
Cowgirl said:
There is NO potential for harm with the Vit K. I'm not sure where you read that but go back and read all the posts for content. Corn is a filler which robs the food of things that could provide more nutrition. Take out the corn add more protein... Vit K is in no way a filler and can't be compared. It doesn't detract from the food at all. It's also not the usual suspect for food allergies.
Cowgirl
Well-Known Member
pixiegirl said:
I'm talking about an excess of vitamin K....yes, it will cause harm. Corn is used as a filler, but thousands and thousands of dogs are fed diets with corn in it, and it doesn't cause harm either. The point is, an excess of anything can usually cause harm.
Cowgirl
Well-Known Member
kwillia said:
I know she said her dog has food issues, but not with the one she's feeding now. If someone chooses to feed their dog a food with corn in it, that's their business. You wouldn't choose to do that, but other people wouldn't choose to feed their dog a food with synthetic vit K. People are allowed to feed their dogs whatever they want.
