By
Benjamin Rushe
Sara Brenner, worked as a career employee at the FDA until she was recently promoted to the No. 2 position under the new
FDA Commissioner. Marty Makary. Brenner has recently stated that she never took the COVID vaccine despite it being a requirement for federal employees.
Brenner’s reasoning was that
she was pregnant and concerned about the safety of the vaccine for both her and her child. Perhaps she arrived at that conclusion because she’s
an expert on nanobiotechnology (although the picture she provided at the link is a curious choice), and therefore had serious and
fully legitimate clinical reservations.
The question is why, as an FDA expert and Hippocratic oath-taking physician, she never spoke up earlier to warn other pregnant women about her concerns? This is an especially pointed question because, at the same time, members of the military were resigning or getting fired; and physicians, pharmacists and nurses were resigning or being fired
plus being pursued by boards, losing their certifications, licenses, livelihoods, and being mocked by the press and doxxed all over social media.
Image created using AI.
While millions around the country who didn’t yield to the White House/CDC/FDA narrative were being banned from restaurants and other public venues, Dr. Brenner wrote
zero articles, gave
zero interviews, and spoke to
zero congressmen and reporters. She kept her head down, keeping her specialized knowledge about
mRNA lipid nanoparticles toxicity to herself, even as she kept her four-year-long “work at home” FDA job while thousands of pregnant women around the country got COVID vaccines to keep their jobs and (they thought) protect themselves and their babies.
Here is the
reasoning Brenner offered to justify her decision to skip the vaccine. Maybe you can understand what it means, because I sure couldn’t, even after nearly a dozen readings:
“We’re moving very quickly to make it such that there will be more transparency, more available data and information, so that people ... can see and evaluate for themselves sort of what the truths are and what’s known and unknown,” she said. “And I'll go ahead and put it that way, because one of the biggest misses, I think, in the previous several years is that there was no acknowledgement of what was unknown, right? There was there were only statements and assertions that were really more like beliefs or things that were desired to be true than they were true knowns.” (Ellipses in original.)