When I was a communications/electronic security tech at SAC HQ in the late 80's, used to joke about No Such Agency and their assets.
☕️ COLLAPSING ☙ Tuesday, February 14, 2023 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Are they UFOs or a psyop? Damar Hamlin struggles over key questions; new Russian offensive; East Palestine gets attention; wind turbines failing; CDC's stroke signal report; and lots more.www.coffeeandcovid.com
Diligent independent investigators dug up 2019 stories that strongly suggested the Pentagon knows a LOT more about balloons and floating objects than it is letting on.
From the Guardian, 2019:
And USA Today, 2019:
When you dig deeper, it gets worse. Here’s an advertisement for military surveillance balloons from defense contractor Raven Aerostar:
And from Army Technology, as recently November 2021:
And from the War Zone Wire, May 2021:
And Sunday, democrat Senator Chuck Schumer even said the objects that have been shot down were balloons:
One begins to suspect there are a lot more balloons in the sky over the United States than we knew about. Naturally, with all that experience with spy balloons, you might conclude the Pentagon would have a pretty good idea of what it was looking at up there.
You know, I was sort of the understanding that when corporations and private firms send up balloons, we do have some idea that they are there. These things look like they were launched to follow the Gulf Stream.Biden said that they still don’t have any further information on the objects. He said there wasn’t anything to indicate that they were surveillance craft or from China as yet.
If it turns out that these were JUST PLAIN OLD HARMLESS balloons, I'm going to be a little pissed, because it would mean we did nothing to stop an actual spy balloon but were too stupid to figure out what these other things were before scrambling jets and shooting missiles at them.
Heard it too, and if true - our government looks massively stupid. Scrambling jets for a toy balloon.there is a story out yesterday, some private group is missing their balloon
1. Yep, if not more. Big toys, big cost.A few questions for you military aviation guys:
1) Do the missile they were using to shoot down these balloons really cost $400,000 each?
2) Aren't the fighters they were using equipped with gattling guns --- which would be just as effective and much cheaper to use?
I’m sure somebody’s got an old P 51 they could do the job.1. Yep, if not more. Big toys, big cost.
2. Cheaper yep, more effective don't know.
Hitting something with a guided weapon from up to 20+ miles away is one thing. Shooting wildly at a slow moving target with a fast moving platform using a gun that has an effective range of about 700 yards is quite another.
Not sure how high these latest balloons were, the things that are actually good with their guns can't do high altitude very well.A few questions for you military aviation guys:
1) Do the missile they were using to shoot down these balloons really cost $400,000 each?
2) Aren't the fighters they were using equipped with gattling guns --- which would be just as effective and much cheaper to use?
The descriptions of all three unidentified objects shot down Feb. 10-12 match the shapes, altitudes and payloads of the small pico balloons, which can usually be purchased for $12-180 each, depending on the type," Meadows reportedly said.