black market lightbulbs.... I thought this was reversed....

GregV814

Well-Known Member


which politicians bought stock in this new industry???? I thought it was reversed a few months/years ago....

anyway, when the initial warning came out, I went to Wal-Mart and bought a poop load of lightbulbs. Mrs. Greg snickered. Now who will be selling bulbs out of my dilapidated old Ford Ranger?????
 

LightRoasted

If I may ...
For your consideration ...

Well .... one can still always purchase incandescent lights bulbs that are used on construction sites. Typically called "Rough Service" bulbs. In addition to their service life being much more than regular household lights. Some as high as 4000 hours. These are those bulbs that are usually run on string lighting with the light to generally illuminate a construction site, or other places that needs bulbs that won't fail due to extreme vibrations, handling, etc., as the filaments are made stronger to handle such things. I really doubt that builders are going to spend a ton more money for LEDs for florescent style bulbs that won't last on a construction site.

Look them up.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
To be perfectly honest I like LED bulbs.
I used to use the "rough service bulbs in my work light and if it hit the floor they quit. The LED's don't, The LED's are bright now and they use less power. A bit more expensive , but they last a long time. I like them.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
E26 Edison Bulbs, Bravelight Antique Vintage Light Bulbs, ST64 40W 2700K Warm Dimmable, Squirrel Cage Filament Edison Light Bulb for Table Lamp Restaurant Home Office Light Fixtures Decorative 4 Pack
71natHL3mIL._AC_SL1500_.jpg

71J4jV9sCWL._AC_SL1500_.jpg
71loWjke8eL._AC_SL1500_.jpg
 

Blister

Well-Known Member
For your consideration ...

Well .... one can still always purchase incandescent lights bulbs that are used on construction sites. Typically called "Rough Service" bulbs. In addition to their service life being much more than regular household lights. Some as high as 4000 hours. These are those bulbs that are usually run on string lighting with the light to generally illuminate a construction site, or other places that needs bulbs that won't fail due to extreme vibrations, handling, etc., as the filaments are made stronger to handle such things. I really doubt that builders are going to spend a ton more money for LEDs for florescent style bulbs that won't last on a construction site.

Look them up.
I don't think you've been on a construction site in a very long time.

https://www.grainger.com/category/l...ighting/hanging-string-lights?categoryIndex=5

71sn6jupVrL._AC_SL1500_.jpg
 

BernieP

Resident PIA
To be perfectly honest I like LED bulbs.
I used to use the "rough service bulbs in my work light and if it hit the floor they quit. The LED's don't, The LED's are bright now and they use less power. A bit more expensive , but they last a long time. I like them.
It should be the consumers decision, not some schmuck at the Dept of Energy.
This is not a law, it's another of the 1 billion regulations put on record by an agency, an administrator appointed by the president, not someone who is elected.
Getting real tired of executive orders and regulations - basically a dictatorship - without congress being involved.
 

phreddyp

Well-Known Member
For your consideration ...

Well .... one can still always purchase incandescent lights bulbs that are used on construction sites. Typically called "Rough Service" bulbs. In addition to their service life being much more than regular household lights. Some as high as 4000 hours. These are those bulbs that are usually run on string lighting with the light to generally illuminate a construction site, or other places that needs bulbs that won't fail due to extreme vibrations, handling, etc., as the filaments are made stronger to handle such things. I really doubt that builders are going to spend a ton more money for LEDs for florescent style bulbs that won't last on a construction site.

Look them up.
Most strings now are now LEDs at least the last 5 construction jobs that I was on.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
It should be the consumers decision, not some schmuck at the Dept of Energy.
This is not a law, it's another of the 1 billion regulations put on record by an agency, an administrator appointed by the president, not someone who is elected.
Getting real tired of executive orders and regulations - basically a dictatorship - without congress being involved.
I agree with that, Make a product that is better than the one now being used and you don't have to pass a regulation to get people to buy it.

Like I have said here a dozen time. It isn't the laws that Phuck us so bad , it is some ass hole sitting behind a desk making regulations.
Regulations have the same presence as a law but are made up by some bureaucrat turd.
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
It should be the consumers decision, not some schmuck at the Dept of Energy.
This is not a law, it's another of the 1 billion regulations put on record by an agency, an administrator appointed by the president, not someone who is elected.
Getting real tired of executive orders and regulations - basically a dictatorship - without congress being involved.


Yeah we should be free to spread as much DDT and use as much CFC's as we want.

Who cares about leaving anything to our children or the next generation.

Screw those suckers!
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
Yeah we should be free to spread as much DDT and use as much CFC's as we want.

Who cares about leaving anything to our children or the next generation.

Screw those suckers!
Please post your address so someone can oblige.
 
Top