Blackwater defends embrace of Islamic law

R

RadioPatrol

Guest
We agree. :yay:


Though, I guess I should admit that I am one of these military contractors that I am defending. :smile:

But still...why would anyone argue against volunteers that support the country just as hard as they did when they wore the uniform not so long ago?



Nice .... :coffee:
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
Well...

Why do you say that?

I'm a big fan of Blackwater, and mercenaries in general. They don't have to play by the bull#### rules that bind our military men and women, and their bosses aren't trying to get re-elected. I think hiring Blackwater is one of Bush's smarter moves.

...that covers the basics.

Using contractors in military positions is the equivalent of congress appointing
yet another committee to 'study' a problem, conveniently kicking the tough decisions down the road and it is akin to payroll withholding; better to take money through the back door that to face the tough choices of raising taxes or not.

Contractors are a way for Bush to cop out instead of being a leader. He HAD to start increasing the number of active duty. He did not. Military action requires, in my view, the accountability and the legitimacy of being a US government activity. A contractor becomes a whipping boy; something goes wrong? Oh, they don't work for us!
 

Lenny

Lovin' being Texican
...that carry weapons should not exist in our force structure. This issue is the inevitable result of yet another poor Bush admin strategic view; hide the truth, the cost and the problems from the American people.

Kerad said:
Blackwater supplements our troops. Wanna know why there is no draft???

Thank Blackwater. Thank the other contractors.

You want to to support the troops and support veterans? Then Blackwater (and others) are your Heroes.

Don't like it...sign up and go fight!

Don't blame patriotic civilians for volunteering to go and fight our government's misguided battles.


Sorry. Your BDS is clouding your vision. It was the Clinton Peace Dividend in the '90s that downsized the military to such an extent, private security forces became necessary. That's why they are in the force structure, not Bush's strategic short vision.
 
Last edited:

Larry Gude

Strung Out
Or...

Sorry. Your BDS is clouding your vision. It was the Clinton Peace Dividend in the '90s that downsized the military to such an extent, private security forces became necessary. That's why they are in the force structure, not Bush's strategic short vision.

...political courage and the OBVIOUS would have been nice; add troops. Give everybody a raise, especially the shooters who get pushed out after 10 years and are stuck with job skills the private sector doesn't want. Enter contractors.

:buddies:
 
Top