Bumper stickers of the confused

This_person

Well-Known Member
Really? Because there are hundreds of thousands of children in the United States who are available for adoption yet never get adopted... They go from Foster home to Foster home...
How many are infants - the ones that make a difference to this conversation?
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
So your point is that if thay make it to 8 or 9 years old than they were kids who should have been aborted???
Nope, that the kids who are "unwanted" are actually wanted. If the mother wants to kill her baby, then she should not be allowed - and the argument that the baby in question is unwanted is inaccurate because babies are wanted. It's sad that some kids are raised poorly and taken from their parents, or that kids have parents who die or otherwise leave them in the care of the state. It's sad that those kids are "unwanted". It's also sad that deer get hit on the highway and are left to die slowly in pain. And those deer have as much to do with a conversation on abortion as do the 8 or 9 year olds in foster care.
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
Of course it should be followed :sarcasm:

Social conservatives support the Constitution and what it stands for unless it protects the right for someone to do something they find religiously and morally unacceptable.

This_person is exactly the type of person we're fighting against over in Afghanistan.
Given the last two sentences, can you show one time where I suggested that I have a religious or moral unacceptability with pot?





Andy, did you ever figure out where I said these things?
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
Given the last two sentences, can you show one time where I suggested that I have a religious or moral unacceptability with pot?





Andy, did you ever figure out where I said these things?
Andy, ready to admit you're just bigotted against different ideas yet?
 
B

Beaver-Cleaver

Guest
Given the last two sentences, can you show one time where I suggested that I have a religious or moral unacceptability with pot?

Are you saying you don't have a problem with it?

If so, why do you support enforcement of an unconstitutional law?
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
Are you saying you don't have a problem with it?
No, I"m asking where I claimed a religious or moral issue with it, such that you could claim I did, and then claim I'm what we're fighting in Afghanistan.
If so, why do you support enforcement of an unconstitutional law?
Which law do you find unconstitutional? Remember, we're talking about a federal law regarding drugs vs. a state one.
 
B

Beaver-Cleaver

Guest
Its not an equal analogy. Those on Death Row were found guilty, and judge so by 12 other citizens.

I'm talking about wrongful convictions - where a jury of 12 citizens have convicted someone on circumstantial evidence.
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
No, I"m asking where I claimed a religious or moral issue with it, such that you could claim I did, and then claim I'm what we're fighting in Afghanistan.Which law do you find unconstitutional? Remember, we're talking about a federal law regarding drugs vs. a state one.
:tap:
 

Otter

Nothing to see here
I was following a small car home today. It had an array of bumper stickers on the back. The two that really made me shake my head....

'LOVE ANIMALS, DON'T EAT THEM!"

"PRO-CHOICE"

This tells me the owner of the car is a very confused liberal. She doesn't think it's OK to kill animals but thinks it's OK to kill babies. What the he!! makes people think like this?

Would any of our whackjob nutty liberal forumites explain why this makes sense?

Was it a ragtop Jeep?? I saw one with those stickers yesterday and 2 kids were roaming free in it, no seatbelts or infant seats, looked like about 3 and 5 in age. The mother wasn't much of a driver either, all over the road.
 

mindy

New Member
No their saying to deny a mess of cells from further dividing is acceptable.

So...what are you?
:whistle:


I fail to see how abortion being legal falls under privacy. Thats one of the least private things I could do as far as I see unless I did it with herbs in my bathroom or something..
 

puggymom

Active Member
So...what are you?
:whistle:


I fail to see how abortion being legal falls under privacy. Thats one of the least private things I could do as far as I see unless I did it with herbs in my bathroom or something..

So unless you do any medical procedure in your home it fails to fall under privacy? I honestly do not understand what you are saying? I mean I guess I could set a broken arm in my house but I would rather go to a doctor and would still have an expectation of privacy.
 

mindy

New Member
So unless you do any medical procedure in your home it fails to fall under privacy? I honestly do not understand what you are saying? I mean I guess I could set a broken arm in my house but I would rather go to a doctor and would still have an expectation of privacy.

What I mean is... supposedly, it is legal because women are supposed to have privacy. How is that private? Unless you diy.
 

puggymom

Active Member
What I mean is... supposedly, it is legal because women are supposed to have privacy. How is that private? Unless you diy.

It is just as private as any other medical procedure done by a doctor. I do not mean to make it sound so nonchalant, that is not by any means my intention, but it is in fact a medical procedure regardless of your opinion on the matter.
So I am just saying it should be treated as any other medical procedure in regards to privacy. So while not 100% private, as there are medical staff present, it should not be any more public than going to have a broken limb fixed or being treated for an STD.
 
Top