Camera Hogg - Profanity Laced Interview

[Sapidus]

You are.

You're also immature and ridiculous.

Hahah


You literally used the most immature childish idiotic comeback of all time.


You are.

and then claim i am those things?

Great defense of your position. You know when you attack a child school shooting victim you are most likely in the wrong. Hopefully one day you will see that.

 

[Sapidus]

That is a boldfaced lie. Hogg was locked in a closet and decided to "pull out his phone" and interview others cowering away with him. He saw no one being killed.

So now he is to blame because he didnt run out and stop the shooter?

You have no idea whether he saw his friends dead bodies as he exited the building.

 

[puggymom]

God for you. Sorry you re so cynical you can't imagine how a kid who just survived school shooting and saw his friends slaughtered might feel that he is in the best position to make a change.


I guess you would rather sit at home and do nothing.

Hogg obviously feels he has an opportunity and is running with it.


Just because liberal groups have gotten behind him doesn't mean his message isn't sincere or didn't originate from these kids.




You guys are so quick to see a vast conspiracy in this case but still deny a vast conspiracy with Russia and Trump?

Get your life together

Oh I think he does believe in what he is saying, hence I am in the first group. But I disagree with his message. I will not support any restrictions on rights for law abiding citizens. I am sorry that the real world isn't the Minority Report and we can't restricts rights based on "pre-crimes". When we start holding law abiding citizens accountable for the actions of criminals is when we are no longer a free country.

 

[Sapidus]

Actually, I think you're a joke. Your pathetic virtue-signaling and shaming are so cynical and offensive that it's having exactly the opposite effect you intend.

Get this talking points like cirture signaling in there. Well done. Infowars would be proud. I bet you didn't know that term two months ago before Fox news, Breitbart and infowars taught it to you.


Good bot. Beep beep

 

[Ken King]

So now he is to blame because he didnt run out and stop the shooter?

You have no idea whether he saw his friends dead bodies as he exited the building.

I was responding to your lie. You said he saw them being killed, prove it Sadipuss.

 

[Sapidus]

Oh I think he does believe in what he is saying, hence I am in the first group. But I disagree with his message. I will not support any restrictions on rights for law abiding citizens. I am sorry that the real world isn't the Minority Report and we can't restricts rights based on "pre-crimes". When we start holding law abiding citizens accountable for the actions of criminals is when we are no longer a free country.

No one is suggesting locking anyone up for "pre crimes"

Why does it always have to jump to the most dramatic all or nothing?

Does not allowing private citizens to own weapons designed for warm = banning all guns?


There is a common sense middle ground that includes mandatory training, serial number tracking, safety checks and restrictions on some guns types.

 

[Sapidus]

I was responding to your lie. You said he saw them being killed, prove it Sadipuss.

So that is that part you want to debate? Since you are incapable of making any sense otherwise?

Would you prefer i said heard his friends being killed? Does that make it better? Does that make it easier for you to attack him since he didnt actually see his friends die?

 

[puggymom]

No one is suggesting locking anyone up for "pre crimes"

Why does it always have to jump to the most dramatic all or nothing?

Does not allowing private citizens to own weapons designed for warm = banning all guns?


There is a common sense middle ground that includes mandatory training, serial number tracking, safety checks and restrictions on some guns types.

I cringe when I hear "reasonable restrictions" on any right. Whether that be gun or abortions, or any other right. For both it is the same argument. And both sides see a slippery slope of gradual restrictions until it is almost impossible to obtain. Hence the reason why so many won't budge.

 

[Ken King]

So that is that part you want to debate? Since you are incapable of making any sense otherwise?

Would you prefer i said heard his friends being killed? Does that make it better? Does that make it easier for you to attack him since he didnt actually see his friends die?

No, just quit your lying you sack of excrement.

 

[Gilligan]

..... cirture signaling .....

English man!!..do you speak it??

 

[Gilligan]

Does not allowing private citizens to own weapons designed for warm = banning all guns?.

All of my weapons are designed for warm.

 

[Sapidus]

I cringe when I hear "reasonable restrictions" on any right. Whether that be gun or abortions, or any other right. For both it is the same argument. And both sides see a slippery slope of gradual restrictions until it is almost impossible to obtain. Hence the reason why so many won't budge.

Except for the fact that we have tons of restrictions on abortions and very few on guns?

I don't see pro gun people out there arguing that abortions should be free and unfettered for everyone.

 

[GURPS]

There is a common sense middle ground ...

... that includes mandatory training, serial number tracking,

how exactly would that have prevented any of the mass shootings in the pas 25 years

Safety checks

so YOU want to treat Firearms Owners Like Criminals out Parole and have the police going door to door checking gun owners homes ....

Police do not go door to door checking on the security of vehicles [another argument you keep making 'license guns like vehicles] ensuring a family member cannot steal on and run someone over

...... and restrictions on some guns types.

which gun would YOU Restrict Sappy .....

 

[Gilligan]

Except for the fact that we have tons of restrictions on abortions and very few on guns?

.

Filthy liar. The firearm restrictions on the books already number in the thousands of pages.

 

[GURPS]

Except for the fact that we have tons of restrictions on abortions and very few on guns?

I don't see pro gun people out there arguing that abortions should be free and unfettered for everyone.

what restrictions are those ... a 16yr old can go get an Abortion

 

[Sapidus]

how exactly would that have prevented any of the mass shootings in the pas 25 years



so YOU want to treat Firearms Owners Like Criminals out Parole and have the police going door to door checking gun owners homes ....

Police do not go door to door checking on the security of vehicles [another argument you keep making 'license guns like vehicles] ensuring a family member cannot steal on and run someone over





which gun would YOU Restrict Sappy .....

View attachment 122015

View attachment 122011

View attachment 122012

View attachment 122013

View attachment 122014

If you are holding it i'd say restrict it as you are clearly unstable.

 

[GURPS]

If you are holding it i'd say restrict it as you are clearly unstable.

great way to dodge the question AS USUAL

 

[vraiblonde]

You literally used the most immature childish idiotic comeback of all time.

Like, ermagerd, literally???

 

[Gilligan]

If you are holding it i'd say restrict it as you are clearly unstable.

What a worthless non-answer.

 

[Tech]

I heard him referred to as Malcolm in the Middle.

Can't decide if he looks like a Hitler youth or a Mormon.